If it was multiplayer.

[Liak(Josh)]

I would buy the game.

[danejerus]

And how would a game like this even have multiplayer? This ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ comment is such a stupid meme

[Unkn0wn the Glitch]

Publicado originalmente por danejerus:

And how would a game like this even have multiplayer? This ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ comment is such a stupid meme

yea honestly man the "if it was multiplayer" is cringe

[John Doe]

https://steamcommunity.com/app/1766740/discussions/0/3884977132832155036/?insideModal=1#c3884977132832404071

[John Doe]

And how would a game like this even have multiplayer? This ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ comment is such a stupid meme

[Liak(Josh)]

I like to play games with friends so I tend more and more to stray away from single player unless I think it's absolutely amazing. Idc how multiplayer would be done, but without it the game isn't interesting enough.

[Jacob]

cool, I think I can speak for everyone when I say, WE DON'T ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ CARE.

[Liak(Josh)]

Lol so much anger

[PindaKikker]

Its a single dev stop whining! It would just be way too hard for an indie dev to make this game multiplayer because off the ai. Buy an co-op horror game if you multiplayer but do not start whining on a game like this which is SUPOSSED to be singleplayer.

[RedPandaDontDie]

Maybe they can have a team based train system, where one person fuel the train, the other drive, and last man repair it and they have to compete against other train to reach the finish line

[Munnky]

Wouldn't be impossible. Multiplayer doesn't mean pvp. Coop would require a rebalance. And a reason to stick together. Would need a bigger train for sure. But it could be done like the other person mentioned, everyone helps maintain the train. Charles would prioritize the train or closest person to the train.

[Uueerdo]

Publicado originalmente por RedPandaDontDie:

Maybe they can have a team based train system, where one person fuel the train, the other drive, and last man repair it and they have to compete against other train to reach the finish line

Honestly, this is actually probably part of the reason for backlash against the push to having everything multiplayer. The OP likes playing with friends, and others prefer single player. The problem with making an otherwise single player game co-op is that the game tends to get balanced around co-op; otherwise player 2+ feels pointless, or the game feels too easy. The problem then becomes that the game becomes too hard or just plain tedious and grindy for a single player.

Yes, there can be different settings, but that tends to not work out; things tend to get balanced around one more or the other. At best, single player settings get perceived as "easy mode".

[Blud]

Publicado originalmente por danejerus:

And how would a game like this even have multiplayer? This ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ comment is such a stupid meme

Nailed it!!!

[Kilo]

I hope the dev presses the multiplayer enable button so we can all play coop

[shade00]

Publicado originalmente por Kilo:

I hope the dev presses the multiplayer enable button so we can all play coop

developing multiplayer is no small task
it would be cool but would take a bit of work, more so since charles mainly seeks out a single person even ignoring npcs
could possibly work for a second game with multiple charles one spawning per person
like the spawn of the original charles

there is a roblox charles game, it doesn't seem great but it is multiplayer
kinda dampered down alot but if looking for multiplayer might be worth a try
though still this is far better , the roblox one might be fun to mess around with friends

[Achos_Prophet]

Publicado originalmente por Unkn0wn the Glitch:

Publicado originalmente por danejerus:

And how would a game like this even have multiplayer? This ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ comment is such a stupid meme

yea honestly man the "if it was multiplayer" is cringe

your comment is a meme this is a perfect multiplayer game. quit trolling and lose some weight.