Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Rely on Developer, the Assets are done in Lunacid (almost). It takes time to learn a new Engine, more as to learn a new programming language. But i think its not a big deal, to change to Godot. Both Engines are Node Based, they have similarities.
So this game should no longer be affected.
In other words, they know what they want to achieve doesnt go well with the people/customers, so they do the worst thing they possibly could (ofcourse selling their shares before too), then backpedal, then the bad thing they initially wanted to do does now suddenly look like a good compromise to the customers.
Its a classic tactic.
Often a genious move, similar to the ecological footprint.
An invention by BP because they were sick being the bad oil guys destroying the world, so they invented the footprint, leading people to think about the evil doings of themselves and thus suddenly BP didnt look as bad anymore, because now all were equally bad people.
Sometimes big companies or corporations have fun little tricks up their sleeves to trick people into thinking in a way it helps them.
So now Unity is free to do what they want, because anything that they could have done that would have caused a backlash is now overshadowed by the absolute worst they announced but didnt do.
And all are "thank the stars they didnt do this". Meanwhile Unity does what they actually wanted.
A company will invest an enormous amount of time and resources in to an engine and will thus be super risk averse. You cant really fool them twice because they will never trust you as a partner again if you burnt them the first time.
What will happens is that the existing games and games that are under development will finish under the old contract and then they wont renew them. Small companies will switch to other engines and big companies like Microsoft will negotiate special deals with much better and unchangeable causes to them.
Eventually Unity will have to fire their management and board and start over. Possibly after being acquired by some company with better reputation. Because if they dont they will eventually lose too much market share and revenue.
So if your game is sold for 10 dollars, you get 9,85 for it instead,
So to me, i'm hearing triple a developers who are to lazy to create their own engine, whine about a 15cent fee on an 80USD title, they'll probably sell 2 million copies of.
Just sounds like a very marginal fee for using a good engine and greedy idiots are whining about it.
Also your example does not work. If they sell it for $10, then here in Sweden the store gets $8 and VAT takes $2. After than Steam wants 30% So thats $5.6 remaining. After that the publisher wants half or so. So that $2.8 remaining. Also people might not just install a game only once. What if they do it twice for $0.3? Thats about 10% of revenue extra in a new fee.
Or if you apply it on the $1 above then thats about 101% net revenue in extra fees. So more than the game made in the first place.
Also, Unity tried to apply this retroactively to older games. This is most likely illegal but it would mean that companies would have to pay a new huge fee out of the blue.
Finally, the formula for determining how many installs a game has had is apparently secret so when the bill comes its a "trust me bro" moment from Unity.
it means that someone can create a script to install, delete, and reinstall a game ad infinitum and actually bankrupt a developer with a single computer
additionally, Unity games are typically distributed in a zip file or similar archive file, not an installer. The user would have to manually allow analytics for them to be legally allowed to collect data, even data as insignificant as being a unique install. So either there's a checkbox the user HAS to click or the corporation will be gathering data illegally
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-zXIBy3u9U
The CEO is beholden to the board, which is beholden to the shareholders.
Him being ousted is just a scapegoat tactic. There are multiple people in leadership positions that are as bad or worse than him.
Unity may be more consumer friendly in the short term, but expect them to pull more crap in future as its overall management has not changed.