Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm absolutely sure that the game is 7-8/10 at best from what I've seen elsewhere, but he's just so inconsistent in his reviews at times.
I will see for myself, since it cost less then 30 euro anyway which is nothing.
Duh, my point is I haven't seen such a section in any of his boomer shooter reviews, doom-likes, etc. Literally EVERY game ever made has similarities to past games.
You tell me, I'm not really defending the game. I'm expecting an average shooter that I have no problem paying for since it's relatively cheap. I'm just pointing out how nitpicky this review seems from his usuals.
Eh, you're just repeating the same thing and not actually reading with comprehension as to what I am saying. Again, I don't care about the game itself as I already said, just saying that gman isn't the most reliable/consistent reviewer out there. I'll play it regardless, though, peace.