guys will you please stop saying that the toys in poppy playtime are the orphans there not

[ryub223]

this is not fnaf alright there not kids there psycho killers put into toys and huggy wuggy literary kills a moose and theres no proof to this theory

[ryub223]

Originally posted by Battra&Mothra_1992:

Originally posted by huggywuggy:

just because mommy is an orphan dosent mean all of them are like i said mommy long legs is a mom and huggy isnt

OK if this no orphan theory is correct how come in the new chapter 3 trailer we see A hole orphanage and text saying. These Children have Suffered. These Children grow Hungry. These Children are Saved. And Poppy saying We can get revenge on those monsters who tortured you and tortured us. HMMM sounds like child experiments to me or mistreatment. Its been like 20 years of the factory being abandoned no child/ humans could survive 20 years without food or water. So how are they hungry and still alive. We see dead toys that bleed so there organic and alive at least.

And Catnap the Voice over saying he treats the Prototype like a god. I dont think animals worship stuff or believe in religion but people do and i dont think animals crucifies people/toys who dont believe what there god/ master thinks. Sounds like these toys are human at the very least. Here check yourself. Also why would a daycare have a gas mask???? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s3_k03RC668

I don’t think there talking about the toys cause the toys are controlled by the prototype not hungry

[ryub223]

Originally posted by Battra&Mothra_1992:

Plus i have not seen one bit of solid evidence to support this no Orphan theory apart for some very far fetched guesses. Plus it says Children not child so it means more than 1 child and judging they have a whole orphanage. a lot of kids got turned into toys.

Because it’s not confirmed it’s just a theory a game theory (lol said it like matpat)

[ryub223]

Also if they were saved why would the prototype use them as slaves and if they were hungry why are they eating people instead of actual human food again theories are theories

[GRMSARMS]

Do you have any evidence supporting the orphans aren't the toys?

[GRMSARMS]

(Of course I think that not all toys are orphans and could infact be employees who found out about the company, however I believe that most toys could be orphans.)

[ryub223]

Originally posted by GRMSARMS:

(Of course I think that not all toys are orphans and could infact be employees who found out about the company, however I believe that most toys could be orphans.)

But not huggy wuggy or boxy or catnap

[ryub223]

Originally posted by GRMSARMS:

Do you have any evidence supporting the orphans aren't the toys?

No not yet

[GRMSARMS]

Originally posted by huggywuggy:

Originally posted by GRMSARMS:

Do you have any evidence supporting the orphans aren't the toys?

No not yet

If you don't have evidence, why are you even arguing against our claims? I mean, I understand you don't want to believe in our theory, but why ask us to leave because we believe in it?

(Not meant to be a hostile message, just genuinely curious lol.)

[ryub223]

Originally posted by GRMSARMS:

Originally posted by huggywuggy:

No not yet

If you don't have evidence, why are you even arguing against our claims? I mean, I understand you don't want to believe in our theory, but why ask us to leave because we believe in it?

(Not meant to be a hostile message, just genuinely curious lol.)

Because the claims you guys make makes no sense

[GRMSARMS]

Originally posted by huggywuggy:

Originally posted by GRMSARMS:

If you don't have evidence, why are you even arguing against our claims? I mean, I understand you don't want to believe in our theory, but why ask us to leave because we believe in it?

(Not meant to be a hostile message, just genuinely curious lol.)

Because the claims you guys make makes no sense

They do to us, and if you can't understand it, that doesn't allow you to just kick us out of the conversation because we believe different.

[ryub223]

Originally posted by GRMSARMS:

Originally posted by huggywuggy:

Because the claims you guys make makes no sense

They do to us, and if you can't understand it, that doesn't allow you to just kick us out of the conversation because we believe different.

Im not trying to kick you guys out I’m trying to tell you that this is a theory and there’s no reason to make it viral

[ryub223]

Also again theories are theories there not always true

[GRMSARMS]

🤔 There isn't anything wrong if the theory goes viral, it's just a theory, however, I know it might be a bit annoying and I understand that.

Again, I don't completely follow this theory that "ALL ORPHANS ARE THE TOYS!!" type of motto, however I believe that most of them were used for MUCH smaller toys like cat bee, candy cat, ect.

The bigger ones? There's a 50/50 of knowing who's an orphan, I believe though that most of them could be orphans, or not, because some (in chapter 3) will probably display an intelligence of a adult, or of much older person.

[GRMSARMS]

🤔 Which then makes me think, was the prototype actually an adult and apart of the innovative stuff?

[GRMSARMS]

NOW BEFORE YOU GUYS COMMENT, I JUST REMEMBERED SOMETHING!


The voice actor of a character (RICH) that's shown in the VHS(In chapter 1&2) is the same voice actor of the prototype in project playtime.




So it's probably a coincidence, however, it's possible they made him into the prototype? I dunno, I just thought of something lol.