Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
As a workaround, imagine the distance between the main optic on the right and the barrel. Then, picture that same length and aim to the side accordingly. For me, let’s say the sight is 1 meter off. So, I visualize a line where the sight and the cannon align on the left side of the target, adjusting proportionally to the distance. This method has brought me quite a bit of success.
It feels as if the line of sight and the bore are parallel all the way to the point of impact. If this offset remains constant, then it’s less of an issue for me, at least.
The advantage would be that no matter how your sight is adjusted, the compensation remains the same.
it might just be me, but the ONLY time i seen a shot land on centre is 1000-1500 then it veers off target left again.
Up close, it's at its peak but doesn't make a huge difference when aiming center mass; and at long range the deviation doesn't require so much of an offset aim. In both the Table Salt missions I totally forgot to compensate aim, overwhelmed by the adrenaline, and realized it only near the end of the battle! But oh boy, using the MG quickly reminded me to do so...