Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Pg.4 "Both of these tanks [T-64B T-80B] have been sighted with reactive armor in increasing numbers To date reactive armor has been mounted only on missile-firing tanks, the T-80 and T-64B"
Pg. 12 "During this exercise, T-80s with reactive armor mounted were seen for the first time by an FMLM tour."
Pg. 15 "In January, T-80 attributed to the 79 GTD/8 GTA were seen for the first time with bracket studs for mounting reactive armor, similar to those seen on T-64B."
Pg. 18 "In late September and early October T-80 equipped elements of II GTD/I GTA partificpated in an FTX [...] Missions covered various stages of this move, which yielded the first sighting of T-80 with mounted reactive armor [...] This alone was unusual, as Soviet units with reactive armor equipped T-64B had previously taken great paints to remove the 'boxes' prior to out of garrison movement."
Pg. 22 "At the close of 1985, T-80s have been deployed with all seven divisions in GSGG's southern two armies. Altogether 17 of 28 maneuver regiments in these divisions have re-equipped with this new, turbine-driven tank. T-80 in five of those regiments mount reactive armor."
Source:
https://www.coldwarspies.com/resources/uh1985cpr.pdf
Just as an addendum; date of being spotted != date of first issue
Considering a soviet Tank Regiment would contain 90 tanks that would be a total of 450 T-80BV by the end of 1985. Even if you cut that number in half it's still a sizeable force.
For that matter according to this doc https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xJmNdHjCEnn7VbciOZPN755rhNkTbPQnLUr98tUCyOk
If 450 T-80BV aren't a sizeable enough force to be included then neither should T-64B (491) nor NVA T-72s (292 (!)) be included.