安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Thats "Ti" version of 4070
I get about 60-80 FPS but its not consitent and depends on situations + stutters here and there.
Its playable, dont get me wrong, but I'm not going to pay 60 euros for a game that barely hits 80 fps with my hardware that should run it flawlessy 100+ fps.
Esp. cause graphics of the remake is medicore, nothing spectacular
Lol, sounds SOOOO very familiar.
Good luck, and good Hunting.... for a game you actually like to play ;)
hehehe and I am glad it was not Hunt: Showdown. Your trolling got tiresome. Was the ban permanent? :)
What you consider fine?
Its more then playable on my end, dont get me wrong, but kinda fluctates too much from 60-100 fps which I think indicated that something weird is going on
Like the only way to run modern walking games in 100+ fps high settings is by having 3090 or 4090 but then every time you are not playing one of the demanding walking games all that power will end up being unused. And even then there will be some games that are not well optimized and will get [C]PU bottlenecked even in low res. I have struggled with this too. But you see, you can't win. You can't have things perfect. It's much healthier for you and your wallet to settle down and accept 60fps for graphically intensive games and 120 for fast paced games. And there's MANY people playing games in 30fps low but you see they're still having a good time and not whining about it.
Like someone else said, this is designed for console so the developers didn't seem to optimize for high framerate.
I have a RTX 4080 and at 4K/60 its almost perfect. There are still some stutters for a second or two when entering new area. But at 4K/120, there's stutters everywhere. Even though the game hits 120fps, still feels better at 60 fps because there's less stutter.
To be honest I haven't been keeping up much with Intel ever since I've made the switch to Ryzen. I'd just look online to see if your mobo pairing is good or if it needs something a little better.
As an example, I used to have an x470 board which only ever received a beta BIOS to support the Ryzen 5000 series chips. What ended up happening was I'd stutter in some games, and in MW2 I'd load into maps to have corrupted rainbow textures all over the place. I later found out B550 board provided better stability but also utilized less RAM, less power, made the chip run cooler, and provided an on average 12% FPS increase. I swapped to an MSI Tomahawk literally all my problems went away.
First of all say thanks to denuvo malware.
Try update DLSS (Updating nvngx_dlss.dll)
The game base is builded to work on max 60FPS if you get more fps you can see
WELCOME TO STTUTERSPACE
When I enabled FSR, it did okay at 50fps+ (which is quite playable for DSR) and though the traversal hitching and brief stutters do exist, they're not game breaking to me. I'd rather play this game with such issues, than play a game at >100fps, buttery smooth, but doesn't keep my interest.
So let me get this straight. You felt that the fact that you're talking about a 4070 ti and not a regular 4070 was a small afterthought that didn't need mentioning in the original post?
Another wonderful display of Stutter Space