Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
The fact I am told I am wrong, but not one piece of evidence is provided to counter their argument means that I am right.
If you actually owned the game, before release, then you would have a clue about what I am talking about. If you still deny it then, you simply are lying to yourself to feel good about your purchase.
When Ready or Not released the forums were on fire with upset customers for multiple pages, for the problems I have said over and over. The developers even went on a holiday for over a month, with no communication at all.
If you choose to not look into what I am talking about so be it, but don't blatantly lie saying I am wrong, because the game you cherish has all the problems I had mentioned.
As I said before the standards for released games has dropped over the years, and Bane is an example of those who accept these standards, and even defend these anti consumer practices.
Onto Ground Branch, the best part of the game right now is the weapon customization that Ready or Not does not have. Everything else is a bit lacking - be it the maps (which are getting the polished that they require with each patches), the AI (which is honestly not on the same level as Ready or Not), the mission builder is not yet available so for single players like me, it's mainly terrorist hunts that I am enjoying and the biggest part is that the armor system and health system are not yet implemented. So it's no where close to release, but it's getting there. I personally think GB will outshine RoN when it reaches the vision that the devs have for it, but it's not there yet.
Then there's Zero Hour, I applaud the bangladeshi devs for putting a strong competition to RoN and GB. And for the price that they are asking, it's a steal. You might as well get this if you don't have the dough to purchase RoN or GB (which I guess are on sale during this period of the year), but it clearly lacks the polish you will get in GB and RON, but it is an enjoyable game reminiscent of Rainbow Six Rogue Spear etc ...
I really enjoyed my time with Zero Hour, but with the current state of Ready or Not, I will probably stick with Ready or Not until Ground Branch is feature complete.
I agree that RoN was not very good at release, and communication was lacking. Developers are human too and need a break after a game's final release. But I personally think they were able to work on all of these aspects to fix the game, and the two DLCs having positive reviews (and a fantastic price) is a testament to their will to improve their game.
And uh ... merry christmas, while I am at it :)
### EDIT ####
Best for Offline - Ready or Not
Best for Customization - Ground Branch
Verdict: Get both! :D
A few years ago the Zero Hour devs told the pve part of the community they didn't give give a $ht about them and they should play pvp instead.
A lesson for the devs of any tactical shooter - FAFO.
Ready or Not = The best one for SINGLE PLAYER experience. There is no PVP, and COOP is disaster, every player will do a solo rambo and finishes the mission before it even starts. There is zero penalty for not having teamwork and basically it is an exact copy of SWAT 4, even the bugs and issues of SWAT 4 is in this game too. There is no immersion, civilians walk so casually in middle of a hostage crisis and no enemy will ever flank you or rushes at you, as long as you do not open a door nothing happens.
Zero Hour = It is mainly PVP and it used to be good years ago but now it is just dead mainly cause of Denuvo. It was a realistic version of Rainbow Six Siege.
Six Days In Fallujah = The most immersive hardcore one out there and it is only COOP and Single Player for now, but there is gonna be PVP added later. There is no gun costumization, there is no weapon pickup and you basically play a survival game until backup arrives and team work is mandatory, if you split you surely die. Enemies will flank and rush and do different stuff to shoot you down and every level is dynamic, you cannot play a single mission twice as every new loading will change the level layou.
Ground Branch = This game has both COOP and PVP and also Solo, this is the most realistic one as there is absolutely no HUD. There is a very indepth gun costumization, good selection of guns and equipment. However, it is still in early access which means somethings are not 100%, like most of the guns have same SFX, the enemy AI and Friendly AI is not so advanced.
This is the correct answer.
Ground Branch is the best. It runs well (even on older/low-end and weaker hardware), especially with performance tweaks.
Ready Or Not is unoptimized.
Zero Hour is total garbage, especially with Denuvo.
GZW "Gray Zone Warfare is the first open-world extraction shooter"
GROUND BRANCH is a multiplayer (PVT, DM, COOP), and single-player game that simulates deniable ops by the CIA's SAC/SOG and other special forces.
GZW has more in common with Escape from Tarkov than GB.