Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
However, even though I'm loving the slow pace of the game, I can see this is not for everyone. I bet a lot of people hopes for a more fast pace action shooter on a Robocop game, but my favourite moments is wondering slowly around town looking for clues and side objectives to complete. It's a matter of taste.
As it is, its closer to the source material, thats for sure.
Like many others, I also hope they make 'Judge Dredd.' Best based on that non-stop action film from 2012.^^ I can't really fault it and expect it to be a killing machine that does nothing else, becouse thats not the source. And it's still fun.
Comparing the visuals to a game that cost $540 million dollars to develop may be a bit unfair.
I think the game looks great. Characters are on the lower side.. but it's a AA game. The environments, however, are pure joy to explore and look around. There is so much detail everywhere you look.
this is the problem with modern games industry. Jumping to the next level of graphics before games and hardware can even handle it properly. What happened to developing it first and using what works until its functional on most machines
U5 seems a bit concerning as well. The stutter issues are a bit better than U4, but it still a highly unstable engine.
Unreal Engine main target are consoles. Fixed specific hardwares they can target the engine to work with.. on PC it will be rough.
But I disagree when you say this is a problem with modern games and "works until its functional on most machines"
That was never a reality on PC until gaming development on console became a priority and PC started to get ports from console games.. mainly on the Xbox360 and PS3 era..
PC gaming back in the day was anything but. Developers were always excited to push the limits of gaming technology often way ahead of what current hardware was capable to handle. Everyone was playing Quake 2 at 20fps when it came out in 1997. The year before, unless you had a Pentium, Quake 1 was 15fps game. Many PC games on late 90s to mid 2000s were pushing technology way past what "most machines" could handle. Not even close... far more divisive than now.
It runs really well in some places. In other places it's trash...
Sounds like you didn't even play it man. Especially the abandoned mall is amazing, almost photorealistic. And the amount of destruction you can cause puts to shame almost every other game out there.
I agree about the voice acting, except for Robocop and Luis most of the other characters are not that well acted.