Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
As for the other faction I *think* they mean the Austrian Empire or the Austro-Hungarian dual monarchy. The Hungarian side of the state would have its own army (albeit under total command of the Austrians) both before and after the Ausgleich. I don't know whether they had great jäger forces at this point, I know that during the Napoleonic Wars they were some of the best *but* also way understaffed, which the Austrians might have fixed by the second half of the 19th century.
On the whole I agree, but the game is focused before the Ausgleich, which happened in 1867. Moreover, most of the likely involvement for them would be before it happens, whether it's the War of Solferino in 1859 or the Austro-Prussian War of 1866.
That said there were already significant Hungarian units (and resentment, given the aftershocks of 1848), so I imagine that would fit.
In general the Habsburgs had a long and gifted tradition with skirmishers and were even early adopters of the rifle, but those units were relatively few and far between, and struggled in the face of it.
And no, they did not fix the understaffing issue.