Rangers suck

[LOLwhat2]

Rangers in coh2 cost 45 same reinforced cost but 10x better was actually worth it now they are just trash

[Cipher Esteria]

Rangers suck in CoH1 and CoH2 as well.

Lets keep the tradition up!

[Sant1ago]

Lol are you sure you are using them right? Because I think they rock

[mr bigdad]

I think the devs are lazy! Bringing out such a bad low end patch and sell it as a dlc.

[AdeS I RapTor]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย LOLwhat2:

Rangers in coh2 cost 45 same reinforced cost but 10x better was actually worth it now they are just trash

I'm pretty sure you don't know how to use them and your just mad if they suck play another battlegroup and stop blame the dev

[Joe Dirt]

Alli are OP in CoH 2, now its time for some balance and Alli mains dont like it haha

[LOLwhat2]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย AdeS I RapTor:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย LOLwhat2:

Rangers in coh2 cost 45 same reinforced cost but 10x better was actually worth it now they are just trash

I'm pretty sure you don't know how to use them and your just mad if they suck play another battlegroup and stop blame the dev

yeah paratroopers,commando and rnager were the best infantry at least on allied side. now they rangers are sucky, while paratroopers feel overpriced

[LOLwhat2]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Sant1ago:

Lol are you sure you are using them right? Because I think they rock

the suck here on coh2 they had a sprint and no rng when it comes to weapon choices. They also came with pershing or caliope muhc better than whizbang depending on commander

[Jonnies]

I have had a game with 6 zook ranger and it is memes. I think you need to be able to swap your build up depending on the drops. It is a bit of an rng commander I feel ATM. I normally only build one ranger, if the drops are good to me I might get a second.

[LOLwhat2]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Jonnies:

I have had a game with 6 zook ranger and it is memes. I think you need to be able to swap your build up depending on the drops. It is a bit of an rng commander I feel ATM. I normally only build one ranger, if the drops are good to me I might get a second.

in coh2 ranger had a 100 damage zook 28 to damage to infantry as splash kinda like panzershrek or so man they werent aboslutely useless thats why pple ran 3 zook even though it 5 man squad they stilll did ok

[Katitoff]

I don't know if you noticed, but rangers are replacement for rifles.
What did you expected out of that?

[LOLwhat2]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Katitoff:

I don't know if you noticed, but rangers are replacement for rifles.
What did you expected out of that?

A unit worth 45 manpower

[Stenly96]

ranger op, look like shock from coh2

[PADDY MAIN S.A.S]

The trouble is we expect them to perform above and beyond, but the game prevents that on the basis they do not. They are infantry in name only and are on par with special services infantry. You do not have to pay for this as you can earn 10,000. points and obtain it for free. Admit tingly it will take a lot of time and effort to obtain that number of points. It will keep you amused as you learn on your way.

Final thought on the battle group it is not unlike the COH2 commanders where most of the items within the group are never used. The special battle group in US is shown already its under used.

[HollyMolly]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย LOLwhat2:

Rangers in coh2 cost 45 same reinforced cost but 10x better was actually worth it now they are just trash

LOL learn to play

[LOLwhat2]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย HollyMolly:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย LOLwhat2:

Rangers in coh2 cost 45 same reinforced cost but 10x better was actually worth it now they are just trash

LOL learn to play

They suck for cost just need a sprint even relic admitted bg needs tweaking which says alot