Why is this game at 63%?

[Einherjer]

- ugly graphic and even worth animations (Opel Blitz does not even have tire animation)
- sound is bad (Opel Blitz does not even have sound)
- The UI is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ awful and confusing. It does not even tell you simple things like a motar confirmed my input and doing as he has told. Some abilities like different artillery strikes have the same icon.
- Icons recycled from CoH2
- The factions are unbalanced as ♥♥♥♥. They have not learned their lesson from CoH2 and gave us once more a absolutely unbalanced multiplayer.

I just played a few hours and can't tell what this ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ♥♥♥♥♥♥ up more, but I am too frustrated to go on playing. So I ask you folks, why is this game at 63%?

[kampfer91]

Because people just perfectly accept garbage as long as it carries certain title .

[Eddragon]

At least in most of the games Iv played I dont think balance is too bad. There is a few things with the most terrible being the italian flamers. Overall though iv been winning 70 percent of games so far with the Americans. British and DAK seem good too. Havnt played WER I dont see many complaining they are weak. This game has allot of QOL over Coh2 and this game in a vacuum is mostly excellent. Now everything I said is for the MP. I dont know anything about campaign so I cant speak for that.

[Einherjer]

Originally posted by Eddragon:

At least in most of the games Iv played I dont think balance is too bad. There is a few things with the most terrible being the italian flamers. Overall though iv been winning 70 percent of games so far with the Americans. British and DAK seem good too. Havnt played WER I dont see many complaining they are weak. This game has allot of QOL over Coh2 and this game in a vacuum is mostly excellent. Now everything I said is for the MP. I dont know anything about campaign so I cant speak for that.

Y well i haven't even tried MP yet and can just bear on what I've seen so far on Twitch or Youtube. And balancing can be fixed. But the rest of the game is just pure impudence and lazy.

[coffeemm8]

Im enjoying it. Weird that there’s such a split between Steam reviews and critic reviews

[Einherjer]

Originally posted by coffeemm8:

Im enjoying it. Weird that there’s such a split between Steam reviews and critic reviews

Don't get it. You are not bothered by the missing and bad animations, the bad sound and so on?

[h0$ChI]

But some of it is also due to the Steam bubble. Some people say the interface doesn't look that nice, yes that must be my opinion too. Some people complain that their 4080 is not used properly because of the graphics, yes that must be my opinion too. This and that blah blah.

I don't want to say that I'm happy with everything about CoH3, but why should I give my favorite strategy game a bad rating? I remember how long part 2 took to be a good game.

Translated with DeepL

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

[Kronie]

Originally posted by Eddragon:

DAK seem good too.

You take that back right now.

[katzenkrimis]

Originally posted by Einherjer:

So I ask you folks, why is this game at 63%?

One second, let me grab my pom-poms.

Okay, got them.

--

It's because in the 50-plus years of video game design, this is the best video game ever made. Simply put, it's a masterpiece. Better than Michelangelo's painting of the Sistine Chapel ceiling.

If CoH III doesn't win Game of the Year, it'll surely win GOTC. (Game of the Century).

Unfortunately, that award that won't be given out until the end of the 21st century.

Which will be sometime in December of 2100.

So, there's still a chance that Starfield, and many other games, could beat it.

It's just highly unlikely.

[KanyeWest]

Originally posted by coffeemm8:

Im enjoying it. Weird that there’s such a split between Steam reviews and critic reviews

Dawn of War 3 had many, many positive mainstream critic reviews and we all know how that went..

[coffeemm8]

Originally posted by Einherjer:

Originally posted by coffeemm8:

Im enjoying it. Weird that there’s such a split between Steam reviews and critic reviews

Don't get it. You are not bothered by the missing and bad animations, the bad sound and so on?

Only bad animations that really stick out to me are the planes. Sound could definitely be improved, yeah

The gameplay is solid though

[Einherjer]

Originally posted by YO:

But some of it is also due to the Steam bubble. Some people say the interface doesn't look that nice, yes that must be my opinion too. Some people complain that their 4080 is not used properly because of the graphics, yes that must be my opinion too. This and that blah blah.

I don't want to say that I'm happy with everything about CoH3, but why should I give my favorite strategy game a bad rating? I remember how long part 2 took to be a good game.

Translated with DeepL

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

So the rating must be "so high" because you and 60% of the community had no expectation, that CoH3 would be a polished game from the beginning. We just play a early access for 60€ and we will wait a few years until they polished it (maybe). I am getting too old for this ♥♥♥♥... well then have fun with it I suppose!?

[Einherjer]

Originally posted by coffeemm8:

Originally posted by Einherjer:

Don't get it. You are not bothered by the missing and bad animations, the bad sound and so on?

Only bad animations that really stick out to me are the planes. Sound could definitely be improved, yeah

The gameplay is solid though

Have you ever looked closer to the Opel Blitz that I mentioned? Or the Stuka zu Fuß? It has absolutely no firing animation. The rockets just spawning out of the vehicle. So either my standards are way to high or yours are too low. I don't know even more... You have full animated models - infantry and vehicles- in CoH2 and 1. Are good animations not cool anymore in 2023 or what's happening here?

[astator]

Only thing that matters is gameplay and gameplay is great.

[Einherjer]

Originally posted by astator:

Only thing that matters is gameplay and gameplay is great.

Another one with low expectation and standards. No critics. I just begin to understand the rating I think.

[Malum Caedo]

Originally posted by coffeemm8:

Originally posted by Einherjer:

Don't get it. You are not bothered by the missing and bad animations, the bad sound and so on?

Only bad animations that really stick out to me are the planes. Sound could definitely be improved, yeah

The gameplay is solid though

agree the planes animations are bad .
the sound of shooting rifles is also very low and explosion even at 100 percent for me atleast .
but these are issues that can be fixed later on