Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Having too much wealth going to one place from another could lead to highwaymen robbing the trade route then your players can pay for security for the trade route.
That is how i could see multiplayer on this game.
The benefits to this is people can join a game with a pre-exsisting save or a completely different save the multiplayer helps both players with having additional markets available to them rather then whats within the current game and as for a balance feature the more product you buy or sell costs more transporting it.
Opinion is moot. Dev said no... Accept it...
And for once I applaud the developer for just saying it outright.
Too many times they try to dance around the point by saying:
- maybe later
- if it sells well
- we will see
- We will look into it.
So it's refreshing to see.. " No "