Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Honestly buy one now and leave the other on the wishlist for another time
The guy on the first answer is just a s*cker that acts erratically on the forum from time to time, don't mind him, this game as BG3 has issues but as in BG3 none are game breaking and development is still active on both so such rough edges are expected to eventually be polished
Edit: Also, AOW4 are still expanding this game through DLCs. So if you want something that feels like a complete experience right now that you won't have to pay additional for overtime, go for BG3. When you revisit AOW4 in future, it will probably have improved immensely (difference between now and when AOW4 released is quite different, for example).
You are better off with a complete game like BG3 now and wait for AoW4 to finish drip feeding the player base with DLC content later in the year.
Most of the fun for me, has been with mods to increase the customisation of races, godir and realms. The customisation is where the fun of the game is. But there are some significant holes in what is available. Just my opinion.
If you want to get it for multiplayer, then don't. Still problems there I see them pop up on the forums all the time, even now.
For singleplayer it's good, but I do think it needs some more content, that will come with the DLCs ofc, but only 2 of those are out right now.
As for BG3, well first of it's a different genre alltogether. And it has it's own problems. People tend to hype it up waaaaay too much in my opinion. Don't get me wrong it's not a bad game by any means, but the way people talk about it, you'd think it's the second coming of Jesus.
It's not. It has bugs, strange gliches, timing issues, honestly very strange writing at times, weak final act (imo), even weaker ending and a bunch of other issues I have with it.
Still enjoyed my 120-ish h with it, for the most part, but I don't feel like replaying it anytime soon.
typical Paradox game with 100 dlc with separated price
tomes for separated price while some core tomes still garbage
culture for separated price while indastrious still garbage
garbage optimization, poor balance, broken mechanics, boring units with no diffrences (all cultures have the same polearm, shield, ranger etc)
devs explicitly says "we have no resources to fix our engine" (but they have resources for dlc with separated price)
no main story (5 NOT CUSTOM maps lol)
50$ for base version of THAT with 30$ DLC while BG3 price is 60$ for big full game with cutscenes, graphics etc
You seem to be confused or just flat out don't get how DLCs work.
Game runs fine for me. Is it John Carmack levels of optimalisation? Ofc not, don't be silly. But I have no major issues with it. It never crashed for me since launch and overall runs fine.
Not sure which mechanics are broken, care to elaborate? The core units are ment to be simillar for all cultures for balance reasons. Your unique units come mostly from tomes (plus some tier III from culture).
This is the only place where I will agree with you. Was not impressed either.
Still hopelessly unbalanced, but otherwise fine. Proper progressive balance would make it 100% more fun.