Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
Report this post
For the campaign.
So, your knowledge of that game only comes from a wiki?
Nice.
Also random map generator in aow4 has almost nothing common with aow3 and pf, it was redesigned. This is why they can't remove underground layer and give sliders for different terrain in aow4 - instead of generating map first and then putting starting positions, they put the positions first and then generate map around them.
There was also the Shadow Realm, which I liked from game 2. Ideally I'd like a mix of all three. Surface, Underground, Depths, Shadow Realm, Shadow Realm Depths. Would be a bit unwieldy and definitely a longer campaign, but it would be pretty neat getting to what should be the center of a world and then finding Shadow Demons colonizing the core.
Actually, because I like being petty: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2971099871
Game 1 had them too.
That's understandable. The underground could make the game almost unmanageable whenever they dragged on too long or were too large. I liked it because it was thematic and felt like a big struggle where I was either assaulting the surface mole-man style (before there even were Mole Men) or conquering the subterranean kingdoms.
People used to be able to customize whether they wanted one or the other layer (surface and underground) to spawn at all. Used to be everyone could be happy, but for some reason they decided to seriously neuter the map generation and parameters. I think in their attempt to make a map generator that was very hands-off, they succeeded, but ended up sacrificing that control. It was also probably compounded by the fact that they mostly used the Planetfall version of the map generator for this game, and that game wasn't made with that functionality in mind at all.
The map generator was perfect for its specific implementation in Planetfall. They tweaked it heavily to try and make it fit the fantasy theme again, to middling success, at least to me. They seem to have had to rebuild the underground function from scratch, and the generator seems to be bugging out for a few people here in the forums.
Sometimes too much water, others too many mountains, others had water and mountains despite selecting a map where one could generate as per the modifiers. Something broke in the transition to 4, even if its mostly stable. The planetfall maps were also much larger, and its smaller size seems to have also affected it in less-than-intended ways, like having weird shapes that were too uniform across multiple maps and other things like that.
The map editor would definitely be welcome. The one for 3 had been picked apart so well that even I took a shot at making one. Was terrible, but fun.
That part you linked says only 1 had depht layer. Which is mostly true. 2/sm/3 didnt use it. Outside of 1 map in 3 if i remember correctly, there was no depht in the vanilla game. Only sm had shadow realm as a third layer.
2 also had no mapgenerator i think. Sm had one, but no depht. 3 had one, no depths.
Since 3 used it for one Mission, it was possible i think to mod in more layers.
True, the thing with three that I'm remembering is how the Map Gen mods that existed opened up the functionality of adding depths to some maps. And it wasn't more layers that were modded in, it was just the 3 that were "technically" possible with the game's engine.
They'd already existed in the game files and were rarely used, but near the end of my time with 3 I had it modded so heavily that I legit didn't even remember what was vanilla and what was a mod until I'd done a reinstall for the sake of clarity. What I said still stands, since only in 2 and Shadow Magic were the depths layers not used at all, but I was getting cranky AF with how that other guy was responding. As if an example of something, even if used rarely, isn't proof of its existence. Game 1 had one with a Dwarf mission, and there were even a bunch of old maps on the Heavensgate or whatever forums where people made all sorts of neat subterranean maps, which also blurred and ran together in my mind along with that mission.
You mean pointing out that you were wrong in stating that previous titles would have had a second underground layer in their random generated maps?
Well, that's a you-problem. If you get p*ssed because you are proven wrong, you should work on yourself.
This situation is one in which I was attempting to prove the existence of something. I was correct on the existence of that thing, but incorrect in the exact context in which that thing existed. Rather than saying "that's not true, those existed but not in the way you're thinking about" like a normal person, without resorting to condescension and unpleasantness, you instead brought in a bunch of snark and unnecessary hostility, couching your response in it, which then bogged down the conversation. I'm not the one that needs to do soul-searching, my guy.
Let's see:
Hmmm. Sounds like I did exactly that.
What happened then? You doubled down on your false statement by making it even more wrong. Which ended up in:
And then you started deteriorating.
That's the beauty of a forum - those words will stay. Forever. And no matter what you try - you can't deny them.
Like I said in one of those earlier posts: Be an adult and accept your failure. Because what you were doing and are doing hints at some things that don't make a good impression to others.
Your average person would look at a statement like "Alligators and crocodiles are all over the world" and apply the proper context of those animals not in fact being everywhere, but rather in a multitude of different regions across the globe.
What you did was the equivalent of going "there are no crocodiles in Scandinavia, stop spreading misinformation" and then continuing with that point regardless of me showing you instances of crocodiles and alligators existing in numerous different environments but not, in fact, in Scandinavia. It was needless, rude, snide nitpicking that served no purpose other than letting you take take your day out on someone. I'm gonna go ahead and stop replying to you, because you're clearly just bored and looking for trouble.