Is there any point in doing all of the mission challenges?

[_MaZ_TeR_]

I've now finished all up to the Swedish embassy mission from Hitman 2016, but so far only got achievements for beating the maps. Is there even an achievement for doing all of the challenges?

[Lar Dass]

it seems hitman 3's content has the bulk of the achievements, i dont see any achievements for SASO except for a side mission pack (that too you only need to do it in one of them) and mission stories are for one of the hitman 3 missions, as for challenges there is not 100% achievement for any of them, which makes sense since most of it would be dlc and therefore if you have base woa you wouldnt ever get it unless you got everything
Hitman 2 had achievements from hitman 1 so I don't know why hitman 3 didn't have it from the previous games. My only guess is that they didn't want to have 200 achievements, but imo i would have enjoyed this, would add tons of more replayability to forcing completionists to go about missions even more thoroughly

[Devil Daughter]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Is there any point in playing the game?

Did you know some people actually play games to have fun?

[_MaZ_TeR_]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Devil Daughter:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Is there any point in playing the game?

Did you know some people actually play games to have fun?

That didn't answer my question

[_MaZ_TeR_]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Lar Dass:

it seems hitman 3's content has the bulk of the achievements, i dont see any achievements for SASO except for a side mission pack (that too you only need to do it in one of them) and mission stories are for one of the hitman 3 missions, as for challenges there is not 100% achievement for any of them, which makes sense since most of it would be dlc and therefore if you have base woa you wouldnt ever get it unless you got everything
Hitman 2 had achievements from hitman 1 so I don't know why hitman 3 didn't have it from the previous games. My only guess is that they didn't want to have 200 achievements, but imo i would have enjoyed this, would add tons of more replayability to forcing completionists to go about missions even more thoroughly

A shame. Master Chief Collections has 700 achievements and most of it is just minor easter egg things from the 20yo games.

[Devil Daughter]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Devil Daughter:

Did you know some people actually play games to have fun?

That didn't answer my question

Since you have difficulty understanding my answer, let me try rewording it for you:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Is there any point in doing all of the mission challenges?

Because games are fun, and it's one of the main reasons most people play them.

[supersand]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Lar Dass:

it seems hitman 3's content has the bulk of the achievements, i dont see any achievements for SASO except for a side mission pack (that too you only need to do it in one of them) and mission stories are for one of the hitman 3 missions, as for challenges there is not 100% achievement for any of them, which makes sense since most of it would be dlc and therefore if you have base woa you wouldnt ever get it unless you got everything
Hitman 2 had achievements from hitman 1 so I don't know why hitman 3 didn't have it from the previous games. My only guess is that they didn't want to have 200 achievements, but imo i would have enjoyed this, would add tons of more replayability to forcing completionists to go about missions even more thoroughly

A shame. Master Chief Collections has 700 achievements and most of it is just minor easter egg things from the 20yo games.

if every game had 700 acievements no one would grind for achievements anymore, they are just supposed to be goals you reach as you play the game and shows others your progress and that is it. You don't need thousands of useless achievements in a game.

That said, I wouldn't mind a few more meaningful steam achievements for the game. like "Complete a Freelancer Campaign", "Complete a Hardcore Freelancer Campaign", "Beat all story missions SASO on Master Mode", "Make 100 people slip on a banana", etc.

[_MaZ_TeR_]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Devil Daughter:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

That didn't answer my question

Since you have difficulty understanding my answer, let me try rewording it for you:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Is there any point in doing all of the mission challenges?

Because games are fun, and it's one of the main reasons most people play them.

Once again, I didn't ask.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von supersand:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

A shame. Master Chief Collections has 700 achievements and most of it is just minor easter egg things from the 20yo games.

if every game had 700 acievements no one would grind for achievements anymore, they are just supposed to be goals you reach as you play the game and shows others your progress and that is it. You don't need thousands of useless achievements in a game.

That said, I wouldn't mind a few more meaningful steam achievements for the game. like "Complete a Freelancer Campaign", "Complete a Hardcore Freelancer Campaign", "Beat all story missions SASO on Master Mode", "Make 100 people slip on a banana", etc.

There's no need for 700 achievements, but having absolutely 0 for the countless challenges is just dumb.

[Devil Daughter]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Devil Daughter:

Since you have difficulty understanding my answer, let me try rewording it for you:



Because games are fun, and it's one of the main reasons most people play them.

Once again, I didn't ask.

Yes you did. It's literally the title of your post, I even quoted it. Or are you claiming you didn't make this thread with a question for a title?

You're going to pretend you didn't ask this?

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Is there any point in doing all of the mission challenges?

The point is to have fun. You don't seem to grasp that, just like you don't seem to understand how asking questions works. You asked, I answered and now you're pretending you didn't.

[Lady Neravin]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Devil Daughter:

Since you have difficulty understanding my answer, let me try rewording it for you:



Because games are fun, and it's one of the main reasons most people play them.

Once again, I didn't ask.

Yes, you obviously did, wtf?

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von supersand:

if every game had 700 acievements no one would grind for achievements anymore, they are just supposed to be goals you reach as you play the game and shows others your progress and that is it. You don't need thousands of useless achievements in a game.

That said, I wouldn't mind a few more meaningful steam achievements for the game. like "Complete a Freelancer Campaign", "Complete a Hardcore Freelancer Campaign", "Beat all story missions SASO on Master Mode", "Make 100 people slip on a banana", etc.

There's no need for 700 achievements, but having absolutely 0 for the countless challenges is just dumb.

There are achievemts for reaching mastery lvl 20 on each map. You mainly do this by completing challenges, so, while indirect, there is an achievment for each map regarding challenges.

[_MaZ_TeR_]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Devil Daughter:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Once again, I didn't ask.

Yes you did. It's literally the title of your post, I even quoted it. Or are you claiming you didn't make this thread with a question for a title?

You're going to pretend you didn't ask this?

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Is there any point in doing all of the mission challenges?

The point is to have fun. You don't seem to grasp that, just like you don't seem to understand how asking questions works. You asked, I answered and now you're pretending you didn't.

Jacking off is a fun activity, is there any point to it? Not really. So your comment isn't an answer.

[Lady Neravin]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Devil Daughter:

Yes you did. It's literally the title of your post, I even quoted it. Or are you claiming you didn't make this thread with a question for a title?

You're going to pretend you didn't ask this?


The point is to have fun. You don't seem to grasp that, just like you don't seem to understand how asking questions works. You asked, I answered and now you're pretending you didn't.

Jacking off is a fun activity, is there any point to it? Not really. So your comment isn't an answer.

So why do you want achievments, is there any point in having them?

What is the point in playing a game in the first place?
What is the point in reading a book?
What is the point in watching a movie/video/show?

[dbond1]

Some gamers are reward focused. It's not the game, or experience they are looking for, it's the rewards. This is another one. If there is no achievement awarded at the destination, then the journey has no value. Shame that, as Hitman is a great gaming experience. I don't think the OP will see that, as he or she is saying there is no point to it because it doesn't have a reward when done. Listen, I get the appeal of achievements, but elevating those above the actual experience of playing the game is rather missing the forest through the trees.

[_MaZ_TeR_]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Lady Neravin:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Jacking off is a fun activity, is there any point to it? Not really. So your comment isn't an answer.

So why do you want achievments, is there any point in having them?

What is the point in playing a game in the first place?
What is the point in reading a book?
What is the point in watching a movie/video/show?

You're right, they should just delete all the achievements then because an objective isn't allowed.

Are you the person responsible for importing all the new Ubisoft games here?

[Lady Neravin]

Ursprünglich geschrieben von _MaZ_TeR_:

Ursprünglich geschrieben von Lady Neravin:

So why do you want achievments, is there any point in having them?

What is the point in playing a game in the first place?
What is the point in reading a book?
What is the point in watching a movie/video/show?

You're right, they should just delete all the achievements then because an objective isn't allowed.

Are you the person responsible for importing all the new Ubisoft games here?

I am trying to say the opposite. Not achievemnts don't have a point, but everything I stated has a point.

Ursprünglich geschrieben von dbond1:

Some gamers are reward focused. It's not the game, or experience they are looking for, it's the rewards. This is another one. If there is no achievement awarded at the destination, then the journey has no value. Shame that, as Hitman is a great gaming experience. I don't think the OP will see that, as he or she is saying there is no point to it because it doesn't have a reward when done. Listen, I get the appeal of achievements, but elevating those above the actual experience of playing the game is rather missing the forest through the trees.

Achievemnts are nice, sure, but I personally don't need an achievment for getting all challenges, or in other games like Zelda BotW (wich doesn't have achievemnts) for getting every Armor to max levl or so.
I would never play a game for the achievment alone, if I wouldn't enjoy the game itself and the time i would put in for it, I would just leave the achievment alone.
Challenges are like in game achievemnents anyway, but OP apperently is not able to understand that

[dbond1]

Well yeah, like most people. OP is different.