Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thank you for your hard work.
Totally agree with you. There's thousand's of multiplayer games out there. This game is a gem for all solo players, that wanted something like DayZ to play alone, without annoying people ruining your game.
Thx you very much Dev!!!
If a AAA did a rollback, then people would roast them harder for it, than if they kept the buggy version live. That is why they don't do rollbacks. Overall the game is stable and the fanbase is happy, so a rollback is welcome, but when a game isn't stable and the fanbase is toxic and unhappy, a rollback does more damage than it fixes.
I get that. I know also this is a pre-release state of the game. So rollback it's more of an option, that won't be after release. I was just astonished how quickly the developer reacted.