Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
long loading times, slow texture streaming, stuttering, audio desync, the list goes on
Highly overrated.
I finished RDR2 on a HDD on normal graphic settings and then replayed it later on high settings on a ten year old external hard drive. No problems whatsoever, no slow loading times, stutters, nothing. Hell, my Steam is installed on that very same external drive right now.
But by all means, go ahead and repeat hearsay without actually knowing anything about nothing.
So I'm very sure the same thing will be happen on Stalker 2 too.
SSDs have no impact on FPS. They improve loading times, microstutters and the like. An old or faulty HDD can slow down not only the games but the entire computer if Windows is installed on it.
We'll see how well UE5 will fare with STALKER 2, I'm not expecting a highly polished game under the hood.
I didn't mean the FPS performance btw. The loading times, stuttering and data streaming were so bad on HDD compared to SSD.
However, it also has an indirect effect on FPS because when stuttering starts, FPS starts to drop instantly and this is a negative thing.
You really have no idea what you're talking about.
Anyone who's even a tiny bit familiar with the part knows this fact. It's pointless to waste time on people like you.