More games should use Cryengine.

[o-O™]

Kingdom Come Deliverance II has very little pop in, super good performance and all with super nice graphics, Unreal 5 looks somewhat good, but its performance is one of the worst if not the worst in the industry, even some developers say that it is a bad idea to use it for open world games, why continue using it?

https://www.windowscentral.com/gaming/kingdom-come-deliverance-2-dev-witcher-4-has-a-long-road-ahead-on-unreal-engine-5

[z1]

It's a great engine (cry). Lumberyard is a fork of it, among others. It's unfortunate they forked off of an earlier UE5. Some of these issues are better now apparently.

[Nite69]

Far Cry 1 and Crysis 1 were way ahead of thier time on graphics, that would be awesome to do more games on that engine

[Coldhands]

Might bail out Crytek too. They just had a bunch of layoffs.

[z1]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย kth:

lmao we live in timeline when cryengine outperforms ue

For now.

[commodore128]

The issue is Lumen in UNREAL5. It's just too costly, the Cryengine uses more traditional lighting methods that are quicker.

[cTz]

UE 5.5 is far superior to cryengine. KCD2 looks okay but very dated compared to what's possible in UE 5.5.

[KaZaZ]

UE5 Looks good and performs well, But only from a marketing POV.

[TACNAYN!]

"Unreal 5 looks somewhat good"
Feels like a bit of an understatement.

It's not perfect, but it is a very good looking game.
Performance isn't great, but with DLSS and the FSR framegen crutch it runs alright on old hardware. I'm running with a 2080S