Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/nsa-whistleblower-edward-snowden-slams-nvidia-rtx-5080-as-a-monopolistic-crime-against-the-consumer/
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/01/geforce-rtx-50-gpus-run-from-1999-to-549-lean-heavily-on-ai-generated-frames/#:~:text=The%20good%20news%20is%20that,Ti%20Super%20and%204070%20Super.
Your card is pretty superior. The only thing you're really missing out on is MultiFramgeGen which is limited to RTX 50 series cards; AND supported applications.
The game has CPU bottleneck, no matter what CPU you throw at it, you'll be game thread bound.
The 5080 imo is a crippled disappointment that relies too much on software and the 5070 is a loss-leader that offers the most value.
it's like I'm at Night City and my character is myself.
When this game launched, I tested it on my system. I got about 52fps average in the prologue at 4k epic with my 4090 and my Treadripper 3960x.
Turning on DLSS scaling did nothing for framerate, but dropped my GPU utilization, proving that I was CPU limited.
I tried frame gen, and it gave me 100+fps on screen, and it looked pretty smooth, but input lag was awful to the point where I didn't consider it playable.
I decided to put off playing the game until I finish my upgrade to a 9800x3d.
I'd really like to get a 5090, but it seems chances of finding one in stock any time soon without feeding the scalpers is close to nil, so the 4090 will probably have to do.
I figure if I can get the transformer model upscaling to work on my 4090, I should be able to enjoy quality or balanced upscaling, without framegen without it looking TOO terrible, as the transformer model apparently improves image quality quite a lot (with a slight performance hit)
I'll be happy at 80-ish FPS. No need for more than that, as long as they are all real frames.
The 5090 is brilliant. 30-35% faster than a 4090. Nothing else beats it.
The price is a bit high, and it uses a lot of power, but if you need the most performance you can get, there is nothing else that beats it.
Sadly because Nvidia gets away it other manufacturers are increasing there prices also every new generation...
You can not really compair one system to an other esoecaily if he doesnt have the same hardware.
To do a proper compair you would need to use his system or your and swap cards, just having a difrent bios setting can make a big difrence at times.
I have better , Hardware than his to be honest
People are throwing around $1000-1500 for flagship smartphones... clearly a segment of the population have money, and a segment do not.
That said the 5090 has around 25% more raster, so it will give you 25% more performance. Plus the built in multi frame generation produces better results than using Lossless Scaling. I tried it. A 5090 would be nice, as I'm getting spoiled by, my brain is adapting too, higher FPS... a constant 120FPS would be nice, but I'll survive with dips into the 80's.