Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
So yes, AGREED! UE5 needs some serious optimisation! Some of this I suppose will be down to GSC Game World rather then Epic? I did really love the X-Ray engine, and the A Life module, from the original 3 games.
For me, the most impressive game engine I have encountered is Apex, from Avalanche Studios. Specifically, Generation Zero, which I played on a Vega 8 (on chip GPU of the Ryzen 3 3200G CPU). GPU shortage when I bought this game, took a while for me to get a older GPU from a supplier. Generation Zero looked amazing and played great on the Vega 8.
More recent, Alan Wake 2 (Northlight Engine) runs well on my outdated GPU, looks rather good as well on low settings. Much more impressive then the slide show UE5 manages with Stalker 2!
Thanks for the mod suggestion Dae! I'll give this a try... looking to purchase a new GPU next year, after Nvidia and AMD launches their new generations. Intel launching their new GPU's this month I believe.
lol look at the salty try hard. he proved you wrong little guy now go back to your furry games
The complete opposite of OP hardware.
Optimisation is up to the Devs, rich Devs use lazy upscaling techniques and force DX12.
Not everyone can afford the best of the best to support that.
That I understand.
But people be blaming the tool, even tho it has the options to support DX9 or just switch to Vulkan rendering. (It's easy to implement these options)
UE5 is optimised for high end latest graphics, developers are optimised to their own limitations.
I don't agree with the whole "upgrade your gear to the latest thing, to support the latest software"
It just creates so much e-waste, but they will remove the charger plug for phones to create less of it?
Microsoft forced you to upgrade for windows 11.
Triple "A" companies force you to upgrade to play their games.
There is no logic behind these forced limitations, AI upscaling & wasteful electronics.
Next year, we will get more stuff to support more of all of this new software related BS.
So why waste so much money on something that won't last long? 20 series is a grand example of that (RTX testing units, nothing more, nothing useful, just a trial)
But anyway, imbeciles will give in and throw their credit cards onto it.
Because only those who can't afford the gear, won't be allowed access to the tools. The elitist scum want to gatekeep these tools from public access one day and reap the profits. (Force you to buy their low end crud consoles and away from a bright smart computer, to keep humans stupid)
They can throw money at people to disagre, all you can do is not support the companies that force it. Simple.
Low to Epic settings u dont win any fps nor does it make much difference in visual fidelity.
Though Stalker2 on New Save slot and on 1.3.2 looks more clear, views to distance are better- garbage to u can see Pripyay now, and runs smoother albeit having in average lower fps(somehow rostok still tanks fps).