Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In my experience 50-60% is kind of ok to push 80ish FPS, 140FPS+ might alrwady affect.
70-80% is starting to bottleneck.
Good news is you could cap frames to reduce load on CPU and/or upgrade CPU. I7/I9 could save u or give u UE5 crashes;) as 13th/14th gen i7/i9 CPUs have manufacturing flaws...
Id steer away from used ones actually...
From what i can see the game loves cache but even on 9800X3D the 1% and .1% lows drop below 60FPS in NPC-heavy scenes.
Source:
I went from a 3600X to a 5700X3D, and I had around 30FPS in streets of tarkov in escape from tarkov, with limited GPU usage and <100% CPU usage before the upgrade. After the upgrade, I was running at 60+ FPS, 100% GPU usage.
I tried this already and some others, and it made my game/fps for the worse.
Without it, with Dlss and FrameGen on, I got 100-120 in the first Hub area and when I use one of these engines, with the same save I get 80-100 fps. So for me It didn't work.