Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
almost no FPS drops avg 70 frames.
1 or 2 bugged quests.
a few other minor bugs nothing game braking.
The issue is everyone's PC has different hardware and software.
Every game that works fine for you on release there are many people who it does not work for.
There are more people who the game works fine for than them the game does not.
Give the some time to collect data and fix the issues.
Btw. in 16 hours of play I had zero crashes, zero stutter, zero 5-10 fps drops.
I do have FPS drops in settlements on my latptop, but exploring its 60fps (3070 laptop). I started playing on Geforce Now Ultimate - flawless perfomance on Epic with DLAA instead of DLSS and with FrameGen, settlement fps drops are barely noticable.
Look what happened with Helldivers 2. It was review bombed until the developers made substantial changes.
It's people influencing the market as they should.
The stupid notion is that review bombing this game would influence the development in a more positive way. The devs are doing their best to patch the game. Will it take 3-, 6- or 12 months to make it great? I don't know. Review-bombing is a better course of action if the devs/publishers are taking the game in a bad direction. It's not the case here. It just needs more time to cook. Patience is key, not "thinking for yourself", unless you can up that thought process considerably.