Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I guess BA is totally not laptop friendly game at this moment. Perhaps some high-end and very expensive laptops might do, but forget about 3050, your laptop will melt down in menu anyway.
MINIMUM settings usually means you can run executable without crash to desktop and watch the intro )))
God, I rarely experience such bitter laugh. :D It's funny, but man, if what you say is true than devs are doing something really bad. So basically, 3k+ $/€ monsters of laptops can run it? I recently seen how S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2 as game is brutally demanding, but at least I can see why, it has a lot of detail and very nice graphics. But for tactical/RTS? WTF? Last such demanding RTS game I remember was Ashes of Singularity. I hope you are joking, I wouldn't want to stretch my budget just to see my laptop melt. And buying NASA machine for this one single game is no-go.
P.S. It would be nice for devs to chime in on system requirements and optimization of their game. I wonder if our dear Edmon guy reads this forum at all or just roams on Discord. There are us older folks who don't use such stuff. Heck, I don't even have f*book.
I used a mixture of medium, high and some ultra settings (SFX mostly). Sometimes its 60 FPS, most of the time it jerks in 30-60 FPS range, sometimes it dives to 20 FPS. PC case becomes hot, every sensor is close to red zone, and cooliing system sounds like a WW2 plane on takeoff )) Heat generation is the same as playing RDR2 on Ultra settings with MSAAx2 (where I have stable 60 FPS)
So go figure.. How laptop will deal with such heat, even high-end one? Maybe only on the short track, but prolonged and stable gameplay? Im not sure about it.
FHD witn an extra ))
1920Х1200. Not a common resolution these days. Monitor was born in 2008.
Low settings is not an option. SFXs provide extra tactical awareness in this game, at least this setting is should be on Ultra in my opinion.
And yeah, cards from 1XXX series provide more benefits it seems. 3XXX series underperforms judging by performance reports here..
People with 1660Ti reported 30 FPS with pottato settings in previous versions, so they are certainly not lying about optimisation for older systems then!
WUXGA ))
"Worked great" is not an informative description. When laptop sized desktop videocard with serious cooling struggles to have an average performance its really hard to believe that some random laptop miraculously works great..
tuff gaming laptops work great for the price, (i did install an xtra 16gb of ram making 32) i haven't come across a game i cant play yet.. even get 30fps in star-citizen n tarkov.
I dont know.. I have an old ASUS laptop with 1060, it wasnt bad in some games, but in other games with heavy workload or mediocre optimisation it quickly turned to be too hot and started to throttle. It might be able to run a good seetings and good FPS, but it will throtlle from time to time killing performance for several seconds. Thats my experience with laptop gaming. As I see it, game must have very good optimisation to be played at laptop without issues and thats not the case with BA at this moment.
My target for BA is high settings in general, ultra for SFX and 60FPS in FHD and I cant imagine what kind of laptop is required for this..
you do you, mine doesn't throttle at all..