Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I do not personally enjoy warno even with 350 hours in the game playing with friends
It’s silly to call someone a sweat lord for playing longer than you. Levels are just how long someone played. The better players have higher elo. If you suck just keep playing until you learn. It’s not a very complicated game. Not everyone needs handholding to learn games. And the premise of the test is to test the servers and the mechanics. Not to introduce new players. Wait until full release if you want to do single player. If you are looking for single player content then you probably wouldn’t like a multiplayer beta test lol
Broken Arrow is closer to World in Conflict in gameplay, focusing on micro, unit individuality, and heavy teamplay.
WARNO focuses on tactical gameplay instead, you will be using all aspects yourself, and losses are permanent. Macro over Micro so to say.
The main reason to go for WARNO however is that WARNO is actually out, while Broken Arrow has no guarantees of coming out next year, as the devs have a habit of pushing the release back further and further every time they are about to get to the release date. The game is currently in a very, very rough state, as it lacks a lot of core features mandatory for a game of its kind, not to mention we are still missing 4 sub-factions, I have highest of doubts the game will release next year.
So in short, I would recommend getting WARNO if you want a different kind of experience, or if you want gameplay similar to Broken Arrow, though limited to SP due to the age of the game, check out World in Conflict.
Larger scale…all the units on the map in BA can easily be just your force in WARNO the maps are bigger the armies are bigger
It plays faster….a good 25% faster
The deck system is similar but not the same as BA ….everything comes with a pre set equipment load out that you can’t modify
Pro’s
More refined gameplay….it’s evolved from its predecessors and grown over 12 years of the wargame franchise
Very VERY user friendly with you being able to auto assign units behaviours…a big one is having your artillery capable of auto firing at exposed enemies or doing counter battery against enemy artillery automatically
10v10 is great way to get started in multiplayer and to test new decks you make
More nations …and more to come…each with their own equipment or combinations of equipment for a different role specialty or ‘feel’
Great single player…with more to come
A growing mod community that will become big…same as its predecessors
Cons…there isn’t really any apart from the different style
Either way
It’s a great game…should you get it if you like BA? …hell yeah! You’ll go one of 2 ways either you’ll prefer it over BA or not but you will have and will continue to enjoy it …and it will definitely scratch the itch until BA gets released
I play both, I enjoy both….you probably will also
Warno: ZERO
Broken Arrow: World in Conflict Version 0.37 ( Currently )