Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Personally i havnt bothered with either of those titles. This style of RTS is just better, a hell of alot closer to the real thing( note keyword closer ) when compared with those two titles, with more depth, thought required, and ALOT more fun.
It seems like you are asking this in the wrong forum.
My dude just find a Jazz band lol
TBH Something closer to World In Conflict would be 150% better but to create an A.I is harder and costs more than just adding some scripts for "A.I" and make the game almost multiplayer.
Even so, I can't wait for the launch day and see if it will worth for me or not.
Sometimes is better just wait and see what everyone else will think and see some offline gameplays as well.
I would probably buy World in Conflict if it was available on Steam. It looks quite good.
Broken Arrow got rid most of many annoying gameplay mechanics from Wargame and make it more fun to play for me.
I thought it was great. What do we do now?
Yeah man i feel like this is the closest anyone has gotten to WiC, it just has deck building and instead of off map arty and air strikes you get to actually control them.
i was ADDICTED to the beta and im wating for a release date to drop ASAP
What is your point ?
Back in the days, WiC had a large playerbase.