What countries would you like to be added in this game?

[chafthegreat]

I'll list add any others you think would be fun to have

China, United Kingdom, North Korea, South Korea, Japan, Iran, Israel, Turkey, France, Germany,

Hopefully we get at least 4 nations on launch

Hopefully dlc nations are bundled to include 2 or 3 per dlc don't feel to be nicked and dimmed for each nation pack..

Curious what everyone else is thinking

[Chipmunk of Vengeance]

We'll only be getting 2 nations on launch, more will come :)

And honestly I'd love to see Italy.

[YOUR FATHER!!!!]

Poland

[KaktusStechus]

Originally posted by chafthegreat:

I'll list add any others you think would be fun to have

China, United Kingdom, North Korea, South Korea, Japan, Iran, Israel, Turkey, France, Germany,

Hopefully we get at least 4 nations on launch

Hopefully dlc nations are bundled to include 2 or 3 per dlc don't feel to be nicked and dimmed for each nation pack..

Curious what everyone else is thinking

Fully agree with this list.
If not included in base game, I'd also like to add various regional maps, e.g. middle eastern, asian, european, russian (seems to be ingame already) north american, so that the respective countries feel at home.

[Imeror]

It depend what the story is.
I don't get why Iran or South Korea should be in a setting of a WWIII european theater, since this setting seems to be the more probable.

The reverse was okay in Red Dragon since it was reusing assets from previous games to easily please the players that were already using them in multiplayer.

Here, it's better to develop national armies that are logical in the setting. If the story is really about Europe : Poland (West side) and Belarus (East side) are mandatory, since they would be more or less the frontlines. France, UK, and Italy should follow next.


However, if big updates should happen (with new regional maps accompaning new armies) : an asian front with China, Japan and the 2 Korea, of course. Something can also be done about India, with lots of equipments from russian and french manufacturers, + some local designs. A truly unique army.
Middle East : Israel and Iran at least.


However, I insist : Consistency should be the priority, above the "I want my country in the game".

[Swissski]

Switzerland.

[chafthegreat]

@imeror I will disagree with the story aspect give us as many nations and unique armies as possible

I will agree with an Asian front China 2 Korea Japan India would be great

I'm more thinking for skirmish mode against ai more nations and flavour the better especially since most games focus on ww2 or cold war ww3 from the 80s I'm excited to play with modern equipment

Edit : you can always make a story fit - consistency as you put it, obviously in a hypothetical ww3 situation sure it will prob start in eastern Europe but it will spill and open many regional disputes and conflicts all over the globe

[Imeror]

Originally posted by chafthegreat:

you can always make a story fit - consistency as you put it, obviously in a hypothetical ww3 situation sure it will prob start in eastern Europe but it will spill and open many regional disputes and conflicts all over the globe

Of course, it would be cool to have every major armies available and plenty of maps representing every continent ; but devs are humans. The release of Broken Arrow will only have two countries, that already seems to represent a lot of work in term of 3d modeling, faction balance, customization balance, etc... I'm sure more will arrive in DLC, but not that many armies will be added, I guess.

Better to keep a good consistency by adding in priority realistic reinforcments for the specific front that is the center of the story. To be fair, if it's about Europe, there is nothing to complain about : nearly every Western european countries have their own equipments and specific doctrines. It's better for the gameplay to have multiple ways of playing than just always having T-72 and others BMPs.

As I said, however, if devs decide to make BIG updates or DLC, it would be totally OK. Just, don't bring China or Israel without content making them really central : like maps set there.

Immersion is pretty important, it's not only a MP game.

[Jugurtha]

Would love to see separatists/insurgents. In the likes of Novorossiyan or middle eastern insurgents. It would be awesome

[Alexonix83]

Spain

[高级督察周星星]

China

[DASMEXX Got the Cards]

RUSSIA
and its SLAVA!

[DASMEXX Got the Cards]

Originally posted by Jugurtha FR:

Would love to see separatists/insurgents. In the likes of Novorossiyan or middle eastern insurgents. It would be awesome

you would, Bandera cyka.

[Pozieres]

I would prefer to see more campaigns than nations. Once you have US and the USSR the rest are just a boring copy paste

[Desert_Fox]

Originally posted by Pozieres:

I would prefer to see more campaigns than nations. Once you have US and the USSR the rest are just a boring copy paste

I think that’s an interesting idea. Since it’s set in the modern era we could have the U.S. against insurgents in an Iraq/Afghanistan type insurgency maybe through a DLC. There would be a lot of possibilities through DLC campaigns.

[chafthegreat]

Stop pushing dlcs unless it has major content disagree with dlc campaigns no thanks not interested

Nation packs with 2 or 3 minimum nations and some maps included is good