Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
To be fair, alot of Sims 4 expansions are cosmetics only aswell.
I however would challenge the idea of what a game in progress is. Is an mmorpg a game in progress? What is the difference between a completed game and an abandoned game? Is it because youre just waiting for them to arbitrarily label a patch 1.0?
V Rising is in every sense a complete game, and was since it went into EA. You even stated yourself, that youve completed the game. You can consider Gloomrot a free expansion.
So 20 euro, for a complete survival-arpg, with innovative game mechanics, a smooth gameplay and a good 30 hours worth of time, with free expansions, is starting to look pretty good by todays standards.
Yes, V Rising is "in every sense a complete game" if you ignore the existence of:
Your literal only sticking point is that the game is in Early Access, as if that really means anything special. But you've decided it has, because you want... I'm not even sure what you want, besides to incite arguments. And then block people who prove you wrong. Lol.
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥, man. This isn't new or revolutionary.
I'm sorry, but you strike me as the kind of person who complains a lot at restaurants.
Meanwhile Ubisoft is hocking a $130 preorder for their upcoming Avatar game and OP here has nothing to say.
The game's not finished and they want MORE money for it? Just like SLC! Except... Ubisoft isn't saying anything about Early Access, so they're in the clear! Ethical consistency for the win!
and you even said why DLCs are maybe a good idea. they are in EA, and sold 4 million copys. if you look on other games with this numbers in EA, after the release they dont sell so many copys. so you need to find a way that people spend more money for you.. or make it free to play, then in average people spent 100-150€ for a game, maybe this would be the best way for you?
It is not "crying", it is a valid complaint. You shouldn't be charged full price for a product that is in a half finished state. But if you want to, go ahead and pay 60+ for unfinished games, I'm sure developers would LOVE even the sound of that.
The primary reason behind releasing a game in early access is earning money to support development of the game. There is no logical reason behind releasing dlc's for an early access game. Well, there is one reason, but something tells me you won't like it.
I've never said dlc's were a good idea for an early access game. What I've said was basically "maybe, if money is absolutely needed and there are no other options".
And yes, lets take a look at all the other games which had no dlc's in early access. They were able to live without dlc's despite selling way less copies BUT this game somehow needed dlc's to survive, even after selling 4+ million copies. Are you getting my point yet?