Why are there no official solo servers?

[Hammerlock TRADING SKINS]

So why are there no official servers for solo players in V Rising ? There are official servers for 2, 3, and 4 people, and there are quite a lot of these servers for each category.

By using the word "solo" I mean a PVP server with other people where there are no clans and everyone is for themselves!

As a solo player, I really miss official single servers (I’m talking specifically about PVP servers, since the number of players in a clan is not critical for the PVE game mode, unlike PVP), which will have standard world settings and, of course, more stable online (I mean that the server will not be empty after a few days, after the wipe, because there is always an influx of new players on the official servers)

Perhaps the developers think that there will be a problem with overpopulation, but is this really such a big problem (which can be solved with one change - increasing the amount of resources for maintaining the castle by N times) because of which it is not worth paying attention at all to those who like to play alone?

[¥orick the Rat]

Originally posted by Dr0W:

Why would they spend time and money hosting a server for a single person to log in?

Just host your own server locally.

i think he means solo as "no clans" server. A server where everyone is against each other

[lorxy]

Because if you are going to play solo. You aren't something that needs those servers. You make you own game on your pc. Official servers are for multiplaying. Solo players have their own sever, on their pc.

[Static_Green]

There is an option when you start the game, to play solo. You can't miss it when you configuring your setting before game play.

[Hammerlock TRADING SKINS]

Apparently, I expressed myself incorrectly, I mean a server for 60 people (like others), where everyone is for himself. Without clans

[FAIR]

You mean a FFA? Free for all I guess. What would be the point? you arrange with your friend to play "solo" and wipe everyone. I don't see how it would work. If it was a queue system where you register for the next instance and players are picked randomly maybe yes it could work.

[Dr0W]

Originally posted by ¥orick:

Originally posted by Dr0W:

Why would they spend time and money hosting a server for a single person to log in?

Just host your own server locally.

i think he means solo as "no clans" server. A server where everyone is against each other

Yea, I had misunderstood that and quickly erased it. It's a valid point.

[Dr0W]

Originally posted by FAIR:

You mean a FFA? Free for all I guess. What would be the point? you arrange with your friend to play "solo" and wipe everyone. I don't see how it would work. If it was a queue system where you register for the next instance and players are picked randomly maybe yes it could work.

And this is a valid point too. No matter how people organize things, people will always find way to group up together and kill their enemies.

Having it solo, however, makes things harder for those because they wouldn't have friendly fire between themselves.

[Hammerlock TRADING SKINS]

Originally posted by FAIR:

You mean a FFA? Free for all I guess. What would be the point? you arrange with your friend to play "solo" and wipe everyone. I don't see how it would work. If it was a queue system where you register for the next instance and players are picked randomly maybe yes it could work.

Yes, people can do this, probably the usual way to deal with such players is a moderator who can track them down and ban them from the server, but I understand that there are no moderators on the official servers.

But even so, the absence of clans for such players will still add a friendly fire, for example, the inability to build objects at a friend castle, open doors, and other little things that will make the game as uncomfortable as possible (and create the need for a friend to develop partly independently)

At least it would be much easier for me to play on such a server than on duo, trio, etc

[Grimear(EU)]

I've been calling for them to add this since beta. I've no clue why the devs refuse to add it.

[crzyfsh123]

He's looking for a sort of battle royale.

[FAIR]

Originally posted by Hammerlock TRADING SKINS:

Originally posted by FAIR:

You mean a FFA? Free for all I guess. What would be the point? you arrange with your friend to play "solo" and wipe everyone. I don't see how it would work. If it was a queue system where you register for the next instance and players are picked randomly maybe yes it could work.

Yes, people can do this, probably the usual way to deal with such players is a moderator who can track them down and ban them from the server, but I understand that there are no moderators on the official servers.

But even so, the absence of clans for such players will still add a friendly fire, for example, the inability to build objects at a friend castle, open doors, and other little things that will make the game as uncomfortable as possible (and create the need for a friend to develop partly independently)

At least it would be much easier for me to play on such a server than on duo, trio, etc

A "dungeon finder" type of mechanic until the slots are full. Yes, absolutely, sounds fun.

[TheForeigner]

I would appreciate such a server as well. I am lucky enough to be able to play on a Duo server with a friend, but having the option to venture out solo eventually would be more than welcome

[BoneBreakerr]

that is not possible they will team up against you just how they do in duo servers

[Frostea]

Originally posted by lorxy:

Because if you are going to play solo. You aren't something that needs those servers. You make you own game on your pc. Official servers are for multiplaying. Solo players have their own sever, on their pc.

Solo pvp though.

[NoxJS]

Because devs think solo players are a minority and, in case, they can play vs duos parties with no issues.

They clearly didn’t get a fu, as usual…