"An eye for quality"

[Pyromax]

I have played this game for 50-70 hours since 1.0 was released.
I should focus on progress and clearing the game but I cant.

When I played this game in EA I must have found 8 or more 100% quality humans

On my current server, I have spent the last 10 hours running around in hotspots looking for a 100% human. I have found lots of 90+ but no 100
How hard did they nerf the chance of finding a 100% human when they introduced gruel?

[Suzaku]

Find one that is near 100%, imprison it, gruel it to 100%, then subdue it from the cell.

[Khaylain]

I think I've found about 8 100% in 1.0 on a community server. Note that culling the population allows new entities to appear with new blood quality levels.

But yeah, get enough 90+ and gruel them and sooner or later you'll get a 100% that way, whom you can then subdue in "people charmer" mode to get the achievement from what I know and Suzaku said.

[Smug Kot]

Originally posted by Suzaku:

Find one that is near 100%, imprison it, gruel it to 100%, then subdue it from the cell.

yup, this is the way to get it.

[Pyromax]

No, i have already grueled one to 100 and gotten that achievement

A eye for quality is to find a 100%

Edit:
OHHHHHH awsome! Thank you guys! im a fool and i love you!

[Shift]

Hunt for prisoner caravans. I have a castle full of 95~100% prisoners and servants for that reason alone. Also it seens people tend to ignore the prisoner carts and focus on the loot carts instead, so it's not even hard.

[Tanyon]

On my most current play-through we had 2 lvl 100% rogues in the armory bosses camp from the start.. we all were careful not to kill them. I also got a 98% from the camp where you can get whetstone. We just got to Dunley and found a 96 Brute and 94 worker.

Last play-through with my other friends we found 4 natural 100% in 60 hours: 2 warriors a rogue and worker. The others we had to use the gruel on which I HATE that mechanic. They say it is 66% to work but it has failed for me 4/4 times. I wish the mats were 10x more expensive but the chance was 100% for it to work.