Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Uhm the question was regarding the halloween dlc I assume since it was a timed dlc.
How can they earn money on that since THAT dlc was free?
It feels like people are jumping on a negative bandwagon here just to express dissatisfaction towards earlier games / projects the devs have had.
To be fair the Halloween dlc was free and a nice "tip of the hat" for people that already owned the game.
Whilst they arent that active here on the steam forum they are talking alot of the discord of whats to come. If you find you have questions why not head into discord and ask them there? It wont cost you a dime either.
I still think they will do that eventually, but they might be waiting until after the big update exactly because of all the posts like this.
I have asked this question many times and have not once gotten a straightforward answer, how does keeping the PvP population alive make the devs money in a more sustainable way that additional content couldn't? Because if the devs "abandoning" the game is just the PvPers going away, thats just the natural process of PvPers getting bored and doing something else.
Are there issues that still need to be addressed? Yes. Are there holes in the content experience that could be filled in? Also yes. But unless the big update slotted for next year turns out to be a disaster, I think it is way too soon to be making these kinds of assumptions. I get that there was a history of this sort of thing happening, but there doesn't seem to be actual information put forth on why its even important. Its just generalized statements complaining about some nebulous malicious intent.
K.
There's a news section right above your games in the Steam Library. They announced it like a week before it was available. I'm sure it will be free next October as well.
Not only that but they did just communicate their plans for the next big content update.
Before you start talking smack about marketing, make sure you're not talking about it to people who've worked in marketing and sales. I've worked in marketing and i can tell you right now that this has got nothing to do marketing.
A FREE DLC is not part of any marketing scheme. It's a non-obligated bonus to the community. That's the first thing you haters need to 'squeeze' through your heads.
The DLC for this game have zero effect on anything.
A marketing scheme would include advertisement campaigns and more. What advertisement campaigns have been made for this game? I sure as hell haven't seen any.
The fact is, that someone got butt hurt over a FREE DLC that was added during the Halloween event. The rest just jumped on the hate wagon. They were butt hurt because they were too late to the party and didn't get to download it, for FREE.
Here's another fact, before you start going off on the price tag on the game itself.
Development studios are not charities, they're companies and and like all companies, they need to make money to stay afloat. Before you mention transparency, then let me just say this. This developer have been more than transparent with the development process of their game, compared to a lot, if not most developers out there who release their games in Early Access.
That being said, the total price tag for this game with the founder's pack is still cheaper than most Early Access titles.
Just an FYI: I don't have the FREE DLC either. Do you see me, making a hate posts on their forums because of it? No. It's called being mature and acting one's age. If you're an adult and you get butt hurt over these things, yeah.. You're best off steering clear of any Early Access titles, period..
That being said, Halloween is a seasonal event.. I'm sure they'll add it next year as well.
You don't even need to wait that long, you can invite someone who HAS the DLC to your clan, get them to build the pieces and leave.
Works that way with items to, like the razor DLC helm and cloak and the immortal king DLC. Can have someone craft the stuff up and just give it to you.
All the DLC items are already in your vrising data, the ability for them to drop or be crafted is the only thing that is actually locked to the DLC purchase.
There is hardly anyone to "scam" here, majority of players of small games have good control of their wallets.
And there is simpler explanation too. When making a game you build tools for your buissness model well before you release beta. Here they go with cheap main game and support through cosmetic DLC. Standard and consumer friently. So for the devs, having already prepared the implementation of cosmetic DLCs this is literally easiest, lest work intensive way to add free bonus/timed content to their game.
The fact that it makes us look at their store is a nice bonus.
But is it really wrong? I mean look at the main menu, they have draculas pack right there? Is that bad too? Are companies not allowed to advertise on their own product?
Like if the ingame build menu had "buy dlc" button, or a popup, that would be annoying and you'd be compeltely right in bashing it. But this? You say we are sheeps, while copying whatever "mob IQ" outrage happened on other forums. You are here with us, just a different fur collor.
What games do you recommend then