Castle Border Limit - Solo PvE

[Ahoy Berry]

First off, ill admit 250 is HUGE and more than enough for a serious pvp player but in pve, mans gots to have a storage room, dedicated crafting rooms, farm, stables, prison, throne room, blood bank, pylon (soul shards?) room and servants quarters, not a big ask but hear me out... 300, if in a future update (no need to go crazy and make it 1000) just a little bump.

[Nymn]

Im in the same boat i was messing with the settings in my private pve game to change to 300 but someone told me even in settings highest you can get it to is 255 which is weird cause you can change everything else to your liking like castle hearts limit and what not.

[P.]

I hope they add a a menu for exchanging items between players and vending system like Ragnarok Online

[Capt.Luke]

Originally posted by Ahoy Berry:

First off, ill admit 250 is HUGE and more than enough for a serious pvp player but in pve, mans gots to have a storage room, dedicated crafting rooms, farm, stables, prison, throne room, blood bank, pylon (soul shards?) room and servants quarters, not a big ask but hear me out... 300, if in a future update (no need to go crazy and make it 1000) just a little bump.

you can have 2 castle.... that 500 tile

[DeatH_Bringer]

No. people are already using their 250 to block off other players castles in PvE. Maybe if this continues it should be lowered to 150?

[Ģ◊иℤ◊⚡ℤ∀муpΛй]

I created a really really large mansion in the cursed forest yesterday its also in Solo PVE, im having alot of trouble to convert lower vampires, most of the inhabitants are undead wolfs and spiders, thats a much bigger issue.

[Ahoy Berry]

Originally posted by DeatH_Bringer:

No. people are already using their 250 to block off other players castles in PvE. Maybe if this continues it should be lowered to 150?

That is true, people are blocking off / surrounding castles ruining PvP but this is PvE, just an idea also hard to implement, have some-sort-of neutral zone mechanic built into the game. Lets say, 50 tiles (from heart to heart) where a "contested area" warning notification would show, moving closer in to 30 tiles (from heart to heart) an "unable to build closer due to higher level heart" warning notification would show, with this idea in place the higher level heart would be classed as ruler or king and the (most likely) newer heart would be an encroaching enemy, the higher level heart can still expand but the enemy heart can't. this would end up being a complicated mess and reducing the border limit to 150 would have little to no effect on them but would affect how your own castle layout would look and feel.

Originally posted by Capt.Luke:

you can have 2 castles.... that's 500 tiles

Also true but what if, for example, i built that second castle as a new section of the main castle to house storage or a forge, someone with keys could simply take control of it and now you either fight to take back control of it (me ultimately losing cause bad at PvP) or clear out what you can leaving them with an abundance of resources and a now strong defensible section where they will restock and continue to seize control of a much bigger fortress the further along they go. All that hard work lost to some key wielding ♥♥♥♥.

[Ahoy Berry]

or an admin

[Murhk]

Originally posted by Ahoy Berry:

Originally posted by DeatH_Bringer:

No. people are already using their 250 to block off other players castles in PvE. Maybe if this continues it should be lowered to 150?

That is true, people are blocking off / surrounding castles ruining PvP but this is PvE, just an idea also hard to implement, have some-sort-of neutral zone mechanic built into the game. Lets say, 50 tiles (from heart to heart) where a "contested area" warning notification would show, moving closer in to 30 tiles (from heart to heart) an "unable to build closer due to higher level heart" warning notification would show, with this idea in place the higher level heart would be classed as ruler or king and the (most likely) newer heart would be an encroaching enemy, the higher level heart can still expand but the enemy heart can't. this would end up being a complicated mess and reducing the border limit to 150 would have little to no effect on them but would affect how your own castle layout would look and feel.

Originally posted by Capt.Luke:

you can have 2 castles.... that's 500 tiles

Also true but what if, for example, i built that second castle as a new section of the main castle to house storage or a forge, someone with keys could simply take control of it and now you either fight to take back control of it (me ultimately losing cause bad at PvP) or clear out what you can leaving them with an abundance of resources and a now strong defensible section where they will restock and continue to seize control of a much bigger fortress the further along they go. All that hard work lost to some key wielding ♥♥♥♥.

How does any of the second half of your post make sense. You posted this about solo PvE.

250 is already too much for online multiplayer. But I agree, solo offline you should be able to landclaim as much as you want.

[Degenerate Trap]

Man I wanted to make Castlevania, but all I got was Keepmania

[Malthar]

Make another castle, you can have 5 of them with only a single tile separating them. Thats 1250 tiles.

[gpcstargate]

If you are playing Solo/Single Player .. go into advance setting make adjustment to All your setting .. If you wish too.
At the moment I have 3 Castle and have more than enough room.