Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
You clearly don't know anything.
FF XIV is mostly played outside of steam, so the numbers on steam are much lower than they are in reality.
Lost ark has a lot of bots, but saying that 75k players are bots is just funny.
Can you share this revenue ranking? I'm quite interested to see it... or is it another bs?
that being said it's even more impressive that Lost Ark has more people than something like FFXIV which cant rally all the apologists and fanbase to surpass Lost Ark.
I know FF14 is played outside of Steam. I use Steam as a point of reference to point out how bad currently lost ark is. A game with more players and earn less and with a terrible review than a partial game on Steam. Lost Ark is pretty much done in the West given Steam is the only platform it is on.
Here is the revenue ranking : https://store.steampowered.com/charts/topsellers/global/2024-5-14
funnily enough those cultists dont even understand these things. they just compare LA stats to stats of other mmorpgs on steam only
But today it is the best MMO.,
btw, does somebody know how long will maintenance last?
Hes also comparing it to a game with a $80-100 (expansions included) box price and a $15/mo sub thats has its own standalone launcher free from steam.
What a mess.
Try setting the chart to United States or something. Then compare it to something a little more reasonable like Warframe.
Tell me what you think.
everybody knows that f2p and p2w games nowadays make much more money with way less players than b2p games. at least in the short run
in the long run over many years they tend to fall off as we also see with LA
"But I know xyz has that too!", as if directing the focus on a different game can excuse the flaws of this one.
But thats just the top of the icecake, as you mentioned they compare things that dont even make sense comparing.
I mean to sum it up, desperation has many faces. This is just one of them.
Did you read the 2nd part?
i did. for united states not much changed.. warframe and FF14 have better revenue on steam this week
actually in germany Lost ark is ranked higher than FF14 and warframe revenue wise
but i am not surprised about that. i dont think too highly about most germans regarding games either.
we got a good bunch of p2w fanatics here + many people which are victims of sunk-cost-fallacy + many german players are highly toxic in most multiplayer games whenever anything goes south, seems all highly fitting for LA to me
but i may be biased, its just my personal experience
hahaha le funny
As a player wouldn't you want to see the game lower in the list?
I know very little about Warframe. Only that its f2p with p2w elements and Steam recommends it to me because I play Lost Ark.
The game is showing half the players and making a lot more money than LA. Is that not a red flag? Bit concerning, no?
Why and how is it sucking so much money from its players? (Not a real question. I don't care)
See the point i'm getting at?
The more I thought about it the more I think we don't want to see LA at the top of the list.
Well, I don't. Hates would use it as a tool to shame the game if it was at the top.
I had a quote of a certain someone doing that exact thing but after watching Haku get banned right before my eyes for calling something funny, ill save it for later.
Good for Smilegate and AGS if it was at the top. Not so much the players.