Steam'i Yükleyin
giriş
|
dil
简体中文 (Basitleştirilmiş Çince)
繁體中文 (Geleneksel Çince)
日本語 (Japonca)
한국어 (Korece)
ไทย (Tayca)
Български (Bulgarca)
Čeština (Çekçe)
Dansk (Danca)
Deutsch (Almanca)
English (İngilizce)
Español - España (İspanyolca - İspanya)
Español - Latinoamérica (İspanyolca - Latin Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Yunanca)
Français (Fransızca)
Italiano (İtalyanca)
Bahasa Indonesia (Endonezce)
Magyar (Macarca)
Nederlands (Hollandaca)
Norsk (Norveççe)
Polski (Lehçe)
Português (Portekizce - Portekiz)
Português - Brasil (Portekizce - Brezilya)
Română (Rumence)
Русский (Rusça)
Suomi (Fince)
Svenska (İsveççe)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamca)
Українська (Ukraynaca)
Bir çeviri sorunu bildirin
Best looking or most realistic? Sony and Microsoft's AAA games are the "best looking". Metro Exodus could be the most realistic looking but it's an ugly game.
On a technical level you have to admit Metro Exodus Enhanced pushed DLSS and Ray-tracing (specifically GI and bounce lighting) beyond anything that came before it. Its aesthetic and visual design pails in comparison to GOW, but MEE is also a technical milestone in PC graphics history that will resonate for a long time to come.
But yeah, on the whole, God of War is a better looking game -- thought technically it fells short.
Cyberpunk looks like ♥♥♥♥.
God of War is really impressive on the character side of things, but the environments are a bit compromised by comparison.
lol "pales" in comparison, it's a bad comparison.
Metro is a tunnel simulator, it's not doing much. They can bump the textures and lighting but it's not that impressive.
I'm impressed by what Sony and Microsoft do on a bigger scale and still manage to have the best animated characters in the industry. IMO that makes a game "better looking" and even more "realistic".