Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3351453752
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3351453678
Here are the clues I'm suppose to work with. I don't know what the game wants from me, but I've tried my hardest and cannot do it.
Miqz helped me with it. Talked me through it.
I wanna say the design of this puzzle is awful. Absolutely terrible. There is nothing to tell you that you have to move the top parts closer to meet in the middle. There is nothing at all to indicate that.
I tried talking to everybody to see if that would trigger the puzzle to shine, nothing so far, and im pretty sure im putting this thing right, now that the dev said the arrows are the clue, which i figured it out before but it didnt work.
Ok i got it, white is black and black is white, the clues are not wrong its just the freaking colors that were swapped.
The arrow on top of the runes literally tells you how it's done
Yeah with context on I can put two and two together, but when I didn't know the solution the arrows meant absolutely nothing to me. They point to corners so I put the blocks in the corners. When the arrows only point diagonally then all I have are diagonal directions.
Wow what a response to someone helping you, with what was a very simple puzzle.
Horribly designed puzzle absolute dumpster fire. The arrows tell you nothing when the game doesn't clearly convey that you're suppose to reduce the amount of squares you use by one-two columns.
Also you wanna know why I was angry? Look at my OP, and look at his comment. I literally said in the original post that I tried following the arrows. The issue was not the arrows it was the poorly conveyed size of the square you were suppose to be using.