Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Discussions Rules and Guidelines
Report this post
agreed its a great game, but i disagree with your last comment - if you use a product, you should be able to have an opinion on it. i cant build a car, but i can drive one and have an opinion on that experience?
Negative people are always first to put in their complaints. But a positive person usually does not put in a review.
This includes me, but yeah we need to start reviewing the game, not just let the grumpy people sink it!
Completely agree madam!
What i see mostly is like 95% of the negative reviews are less than 15 hours of game time. One i saw was 0.5 hours, think there needs to be a option to select to only have reviews done if the person has put 20 or so hours into a game BEFORE making a negative review about a game that they barely put an hour in. If most of them actually played the game longer they would find that they may or may not enjoy it. That just my take on it would love to hear others
20? It should be more like 50
I'm honestly surprised you're the only person in this thread who thought of that.
Ignoring complaints and bad reviews from customers just because they "can't make a game/food/insert any product here" is surefire way to sink your business.
Pretty extreme considering most AAA titles have 9-20h campaigns. I get where you guys are coming from but the bottom line is you don't need 20 hours to know something is not for you. Leave your positive review and quit wanting to silence those who do not share your opinion. Outweigh them instead.
Yeah, after reading this post whent to see the reviews and its mostly positive! All the bad comments are from people who have ~1-2h max in the game, so honestly those people should not be allowed to make a review or comment. 20 might be a bit much but 10-15 sounds like a good amount of time to get atleast the basics and a bit more of the game experience to be elegiable for a review.
To be honest thats one of the problems of 3A industry atm, there was a time when they would put a lot of effort in to their campaings to make them last. Not just annual rereleases with the same stuff and a “new” 8h campaing; but tottaly of topic atm.
If you are going to berate something after not even giving it a chance (0,5-1h is not a chance) and leaving a negative review for a first glance, messing with someones efforts and income; well the review it better be grounded somewhere to have meaning. If you are going to buy a game play it for 1h and see that its not what you expected and then ***** about it, im sorry thats your fault. If you are unsure, read the description, watch some gameplay and read a review from someone who put in the hours in to the game to know what hes talking about, and then decide to buy it or not.
So no, i disagree that we should outweigh them. Thats a good outcome in any case, but there should be a time minimum to be able to leave a review and mess with someones work….especially in early acess!!
And while we are at it, kids can’t complain and new employees should be neutral for a long period of time (let’s say 20 yrs for kids, and 2 years for new jobs) since they also don’t have enough playtime to know what it’s really all about yet.