Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Suppose Blue is True. This would mean that White is False (both because of Blue's statement and because of the standard rules of the boxes), meaning that the gems are in White.
It seems I've heard this before: Assuming a statement is true and then deriving a non-contradictory conclusion does not necessarily mean the statement is true; only when the assumption leads to a contradictory result can it prove that the assumption is false (so called "proof by contradiction").
Wow!!That's really a smart solution!
For the box puzzles in the game we have an additional piece of knowledge, namely that there is only one solution, This means that if we find a valid set of true/false values for the statements it has to be the answer.
That makes sense! I'll check this later