Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm not sure which came first, but I suspect others preceded even NGU.
i will do the same with this1 when i reach that point
Ever played Anti Idle?
Same logic, HAS to be the same code right? Oh darn it was written before NGU.
Games are inspired by or have ideas from other games and implement them in different ways. Copy? No. Just because it's an idler doesn't mean it's copying anything. I'm sure the developer of NGU got inspired by another title and the way a game worked and wanted to do their on take on it. People need to understand that games aren't copies of copies, but more on inspiration and self-implementation from ideas of other games mechanics, systems, etc. This has always been a thing within gaming, movies, shows, products, etc -- and will ALWAYS be a thing.
anti-idle has a different UI and no cores. this game lifts both of these from NGU
So far I havent seen anything to this game that is unique at all other then its premise of being a more like a dungeon crawler, where NGU idle was more silly.