Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
That's too bad. Thank you for the response. Denny Crane.
The President of Unity had publicly insulted developers using his software that refuse to over-monetize their games. As a result, a lot of people are jumping ship to Godot and Unreal, polar opposites of the spectrum. In reality, though, Unity is unaffected. The only people truly jumping ship are people who don't program in the first place, or people who have decided that learning another engine is better than sticking around. Developers that know how to use it will. It's free, has the most documentation, and has innate compatibility with a lot of the most common languages out there. Most beginners use it because it's so open ended and modular. Godot is the only real competitor in the free engine market, but Godot's David to Unity's Goliath. There's little documentation or tutoring online, there's only a handful of big hit indie games coming out made on Godot, and despite being open source there are not that many high quality modules for the engine.
TL;DR: Unity's President is an Ass and some people are mad about it.
...As of the current moment, that's just 'concerning', and doesn't actually impact Unity. But it's not a good sign for the direction things might go in the future.