Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I personally would hope they can mesh the Mid East and African Fronts. That would bring in the Ottomans, new factions and weapons, and different terrain then that of green Europe.
Others have stated the Serbian Front.
Whatever it is, if it is, i'm hopeful.
That sounds like they plan more support for Isonzo. Could mean a new roadmap will be posted with them stating the current one being a pain to edit. I would also note the original roadmap image had an arrow after the last map.
Combining the games is not something that is very wise.
What would be wiser would be a game from the groundup for all theatres of the war. That way no community split caused by different gamemodes
I was thinking on a more gameplay oriented side, but yes that can be an issue if the focus is also on that.
Didn't say it was perfect.
Goal is to keep people playing together and keep the content development focused on that one larger group.
I know what I'm about to write sounds absurd given that it was a war of attrition at the time, but I find it very repetitive. I know full well that Izenso is aimed at a so-called niche audience, as this historical period is not appreciated by everyone. However, I would have liked to see another approach to vary the pleasures. In any case, thank you for answering my question.
this is very good work I love this game thanks you