How does this game compare to BF1?

[KFCBUCKETS9000]

In term's of gameplay?

[-OrLoK- Слава Україн]

less slick but with a lean towards "realism".

less arcadey, if you will.

I liked BF1 but prefer this. If the devs had the BF1 budget, it would be superb.

[Toshio]

Bf 1 is fast, colorfull and easy to learn.
This is slow, tense and unforgiving. Instead of bf here you MUST learn where to hide and how. When to push, and how. Any hit is death. Artyllery - death, gas - death, stand still - death, move too fast -.....
This game capture the atmosphere, the horror of ww1 first of all. And it has following problems - like you have to push, when you hear a whistle, even if it is 100% death. And not many players like to have 5/10-20 kda, even if it would win a game.

[Ithaqua]

It's not made by EA, so that makes it roughly 1 million percent better right off of the bat.

[Roadside Picric]

These two games share ZERO similarity other than both being FPS and WW1 background (sorta, BF1 is ww1 game with isekai tecknology).

[Demonov]

No submachine guns in Isonzo. That's already a huge advantage in favour of Isonzo. Almost everything is either bolt-action or semi-automatic, except the very occasional light machine gun or the wall-mounted heavy machine gun.

I did not enjoy Battlefield 1 due to the SMGs.

[BARRY]

Isonzo is more immersive than bf1 , is a great game 😀

[Rhino]

It is brutal. It is random. You die so many deaths you can't control, and yet perservereance is the key to success.

Your life in this game means nothing. K/D means nothing. You fight and die for the greater good.