安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
and from there, it seems like grifters are hanging "I know what happened" or at least were over a 'buy my tickets to my band' while manipulating language to make you imagine the worst possible scenario.
I think both sides are doing that, however 1 side makes you imaging illegal acts, the other side makes you think an inappropriate joke. given that several internal reviews apparently happened and determined it wasn't sexting, i'm willing to hear that argument out because if it was sexting and someone underage, he would have been in jail.
im sorry but how are they supporting a pedophile when they litterly want him as a predator in the game? A PREDATOR, i mean that would just help cement even more to people to what he is, i doubht dr pedo would want that.
I guess it could've gotten removed... but surely someone would've archived the page
more so education and the way we teach kids at home where authority is never to be questioned, and in schools with 'just do it my way, any other way is wrong'
all this does is make people grow up assuming an authority figure 1 knows and 2 is doing what's best for them.