Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
How would you even limit top speed within the bounds of a PP based system anyway? Just punish people for top speed builds, that's probably going to punish more genuine players than people playing unfairly.
I do play Horizon Tour, much friendlier all around, rarely get a rammer, rarely see somebody so far ahead that it's clear they are cheating (when I have they ended up glitching out and not finishing the tour).
Your suggestion is a can of worms that wouldn't lead to anything good. What about acceleration and traction? You want to cap this, too? In the end, why even have different cars and tunes, they'd be all the same eventually.
For the other person running what seemed like an identical setup to my car, I'm sorry. We both had the same speed, cornering, etc. And really just tripped all over each other in open racing.
Variety of setups, top speed, handling, traction, etc 'should' emphasis on should. Allow for certain conditions you excel or suffer in. However, it seems that the meta allows far more winning with conditions that end up more common.
Not having a lot of handling, so much as "just enough". Not having too much top end so much as a lot of acceleration.
And, my biggest criticism of open racing. Just drive a rally setup and you'll do better over all.
Well that's how I tune my cars. Only just enough grip that it's challenging but not frustrating to drive fast and just enough top speed that you aren't hitting the rev limiter in top gear. With that I can win more often than not against the AI in Pro difficulty on road races and also do decently enough in Horizon Open that I'm usually on the podium.
But if I'm behind somebody that is fishtailing all over the road, all bets are off. I might quit or I might barge past, but if you are swerving so much that I can't make a clean pass even though I'm faster, I'm not playing nice.
A perfect tune would actually be track specific.. a track with long sweeping straights would benefit from a different tune to one with more/sharper corners.
For example, I'm absolutely bossing it with the ford GT40 64, on this weeks 'can you a-ford it' challenge.
More luck than skill but I have the perfect tune for this challenge... I'm just about hitting the rev limiter in top gear on the straights...no need for more speed, in this case better brakes, launch and handling really pay off, as I can brake later, corner faster, and accelerate out of the corner faster than 99% of the competition, so I'm just sailing past everyone on the corners.
Another example is the MG metro I have... a top speed of 120 which is really slow, but awesome acceleration and excellent offroad tuning...but it's only any use on one tight offroad track: the Baja circuit, as it's so tight and twisty, top speed is pretty much irrelevant.
Well yeah, even down to the camber angles, and the individual gear rations tuned to optimise as many corners as possible. I used to do that in Gran Turismo back on the PSX.
I have a P900 KTM Xbow tuned for the track that smokes almost everything on every circuit at Pro difficulty except Playa Azul which is basically flat out 90% of the time and it just doesn't have the top speed necessary. I just couldn't be bothered trying to re-tune it just for that one track because it's perfect. Unusable on the Colossus because it gets smoked when you get to the really long fast highway sections.
That's the spirit of Horizon!
Case in point, the new Nissan Z performance is putting out 400 hp at the crank based on Nissan's numbers. The BRZ puts out just over 200. Yet on the track the Z and the BRZ are almost in a dead heat. Why? Surely the Z can leave the BRZ in the dust on the straights right? Of course. But it can't handle the corners and so any advantage it creates in the straights it loses in the corners.
But the Nismo version of the Z will absolutely destroy the BRZ because it has far better handling. However, the Nismo Z will be a pain in the butt on streets because of the suspension setup, whereas the BRZ might be a tad nicer as a daily. Horsepower is not everything. It is also how you put it to the ground.
Speed on a road course and an oval, is more about handling than raw power. I see people with drag strip tunes on a road course and I know it isn't going to end well. Two very different races with different goals.