Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
Normas y directrices sobre discusión
Denunciar este mensaje
I like the fact enemies rush into cleared buildings, even with no tunnels, it´s just like they come from outside the map boundaries, doing the impression of the map being bigger.
RoN... Im not definitely into that game, but default behaviour where it´s all about non-lethal weapons... it´s like orange and apples with Fallujah. I don´t get why it´s the bar to compare with this game. Not to mention procedural buildings and enemy spawns.
RON is great now. Its time to stop crying about all the drama from a few years ago. Maybe don't buy into early access and early supporter projects if you can't stand the heat. Childish behavior. All these games are unique enough to enjoy them all together.
The game has only been released for a year as of December. So your comment about drama a few years ago is utter ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
Typical non educated gamer, who buys a game later on then pretends they know of the release or early access situations. Early Access is not release, and anything that happens during Early Access can't be compared to release.
My issues are all at release. I as well as others defended the game in Early Access, when the developers dropped support for updates for a year. They used reasoning that it slowed down their production time, which we bought into expecting a finished polished product.
The only childish comments are from you and others, who blindly excuse and defend developers like VOID. As I said before consumers like you are why we are being treated like ♥♥♥♥ from game companies now a days. We wouldn't accept this from car manufacturers...
Buying into early access and supporting early is an obvious risk. The moment publisher problems started coming up I already knew we were gonna get a different game. It's childish to keep crying about it still. It happened. Get over it. Will happen again with other games. I expect some disappointments with Six Days as well. Don't support early if you can't accept that. Wait to see the finished product. The game we got is still good. Like every game it has its flaws but it's not "just a pretty looking game." It has shaped up into something tactical shooter fans enjoy.
I don't blindly excuse anything. I wanted to support another tactical shooter and that is what we got. Others expected a lot more. I think that was a dumb risk. Devs were clearly overpromising. They were way over their heads and made a lot of mistakes during development. Still, the economy did not crash and my loved ones are not in danger cause I enjoy RoN along all these other games. And now we got another good tactical shooter. The more competition in this genre the better. It may not be the game you wanted and it's not a perfect game but it's a good tactical shooter. I understand why tactical shooter fans like it and why it comes up in conversations compared to other tactical shooters. Nothing sad about that except the over dramatic whiny crap takes on its current state.
If you want to rely on hipfire in 6DiF your survivalbility chance will drop towards 0%.
I like the system as it is right now.
Your inability to use proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation is kind of a detriment to your argument. People won't take you seriously if the points your trying to argue come off as immature and childish. If you can't put effort into spelling properly then you 100% don't put the effort into the game either.
Try being a bit more respectful when you come off with posts like this. I personally would have taken any opinion you had alot more seriously if it came from a place that showed you cared. Instead you just seem like you're not good at the game, and don't have the ability to criticise a game properly.
Devs, you all missed the mark by a mile!!
If Marines are not playing your game, you got problems!!!
It shows that the games military aspect is bad, it doesn't matter that Military are not happy with the game it shows that the game in general is not good. Civilians don't know any better, So when someone from the military tells you that the games combat aspects are off or don't feel right, you should take their word for it.