Worst shooter ever

[Liebertini]

I have never in my life seen such a
idea and realization as in this project.
“six Days of Falluhja” spasm.
Too bad about the programming work.
Not even my hamster can play it.
I'm happy to do without the details, it's not worth it.
Yes.....great graphics.....but that's it

[Tundr4]

Originally posted by Sefin:

Originally posted by BRAN:

If his pro gamer hamster can't play it, NOBODY can! Including Chuck Norris.
Just stay with COD.

The number of enemies for 4 man squad is ridiculous and straight up from fantasy land.
Spawning enemies in areas you just cleared is also very stupid and frustrating at the same time.

I would highly reduce number of enemies so it is actually tactical game and not shooting gallery.

In the past I have soloed missions with 20 enemies. Now we are facing +80 bad guys scenarios, however I strongly believe the game is easier. With the ability to respawn into AI bodies, plus reinforcements, plus the option of a second AAV, a single player can respawn A LOT. I mean not being wounded, which can be infinite (wounded with no AI in the past equaled dead), but dead.

I like the fact enemies rush into cleared buildings, even with no tunnels, it´s just like they come from outside the map boundaries, doing the impression of the map being bigger.

RoN... Im not definitely into that game, but default behaviour where it´s all about non-lethal weapons... it´s like orange and apples with Fallujah. I don´t get why it´s the bar to compare with this game. Not to mention procedural buildings and enemy spawns.

[Cypher]

RoN is just a pretty looking game, and all the fanboys praise it and compare it to all other tactical shooters now. You get the posts on Ground Branch, here and RoN its really sad.

[Gonzo850]

Originally posted by Cypher:

RoN is just a pretty looking game, and all the fanboys praise it and compare it to all other tactical shooters now. You get the posts on Ground Branch, here and RoN its really sad.

RON is great now. Its time to stop crying about all the drama from a few years ago. Maybe don't buy into early access and early supporter projects if you can't stand the heat. Childish behavior. All these games are unique enough to enjoy them all together.

[Captain Flappy]

Originally posted by EdgeLordHunt:

Originally posted by Castor:

Paragraphs, periods, and punctuation. Learn to use them before creating a wall of text. ^^^

I'm not wrong tho & I don't really care about punctuation when It's a online steam discussion . I'm positive ur's isn't much better mr war of rights clan boy. Quick to insult spelling or anything else that isn't game related because you are to stupid to hold a actual conversation . Would love to have a open debate about the game but my guess is you fall in the line of speech impediment or mental disorder, take ya pick.

People can't read your verbal diarrhea if it's not legible due to no punctuation.

[♂TheBlasterMaster™✞]

Originally posted by Captain Flappy:

Originally posted by EdgeLordHunt:

I'm not wrong tho & I don't really care about punctuation when It's a online steam discussion . I'm positive ur's isn't much better mr war of rights clan boy. Quick to insult spelling or anything else that isn't game related because you are to stupid to hold a actual conversation . Would love to have a open debate about the game but my guess is you fall in the line of speech impediment or mental disorder, take ya pick.

People can't read your verbal diarrhea if it's not legible due to no punctuation.

It's hard to read that illiterate garbage. To say "I don't really care about punctuation when It's a online steam discussion" is clearly a defensive move to defend that's all he knows.

[Cypher]

Originally posted by Gonzo850:

Originally posted by Cypher:

RoN is just a pretty looking game, and all the fanboys praise it and compare it to all other tactical shooters now. You get the posts on Ground Branch, here and RoN its really sad.

RON is great now. Its time to stop crying about all the drama from a few years ago. Maybe don't buy into early access and early supporter projects if you can't stand the heat. Childish behavior. All these games are unique enough to enjoy them all together.

The game has only been released for a year as of December. So your comment about drama a few years ago is utter ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.

Typical non educated gamer, who buys a game later on then pretends they know of the release or early access situations. Early Access is not release, and anything that happens during Early Access can't be compared to release.

My issues are all at release. I as well as others defended the game in Early Access, when the developers dropped support for updates for a year. They used reasoning that it slowed down their production time, which we bought into expecting a finished polished product.

The only childish comments are from you and others, who blindly excuse and defend developers like VOID. As I said before consumers like you are why we are being treated like ♥♥♥♥ from game companies now a days. We wouldn't accept this from car manufacturers...

[Gonzo850]

Originally posted by Cypher:

Buying into early access and supporting early is an obvious risk. The moment publisher problems started coming up I already knew we were gonna get a different game. It's childish to keep crying about it still. It happened. Get over it. Will happen again with other games. I expect some disappointments with Six Days as well. Don't support early if you can't accept that. Wait to see the finished product. The game we got is still good. Like every game it has its flaws but it's not "just a pretty looking game." It has shaped up into something tactical shooter fans enjoy.

I don't blindly excuse anything. I wanted to support another tactical shooter and that is what we got. Others expected a lot more. I think that was a dumb risk. Devs were clearly overpromising. They were way over their heads and made a lot of mistakes during development. Still, the economy did not crash and my loved ones are not in danger cause I enjoy RoN along all these other games. And now we got another good tactical shooter. The more competition in this genre the better. It may not be the game you wanted and it's not a perfect game but it's a good tactical shooter. I understand why tactical shooter fans like it and why it comes up in conversations compared to other tactical shooters. Nothing sad about that except the over dramatic whiny crap takes on its current state.

[Ready Reaper]

Dead game. Arcade shooter hipfire and flinching when scared killed this game.

[Magnus Aurelius, Bright Lord]

Originally posted by Sefin:

Originally posted by BRAN:

If his pro gamer hamster can't play it, NOBODY can! Including Chuck Norris.
Just stay with COD.

The number of enemies for 4 man squad is ridiculous and straight up from fantasy land.

So you would prefer if 19 missions out of 20 has no enemies at all ? That would be fun if it were based on real life.

[Ready Reaper]

Originally posted by XPS:

Originally posted by Drusus:

Point aim should be like this
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3367956397

Understandable this is a example from ARMA 3. but Six Days In Fallujah is still under development and is a master peace in progress. just Hold fast

Fanboys defend arcade hipfire. Probably wont get fixed unless we keep pointing out the mistakes.

[BRAN]

6DiF features arcade hipfire? Like every other shooter, it does.
If you want to rely on hipfire in 6DiF your survivalbility chance will drop towards 0%.
I like the system as it is right now.

[Joey Stalin]

Originally posted by EdgeLordHunt:

Originally posted by Castor:

Paragraphs, periods, and punctuation. Learn to use them before creating a wall of text. ^^^

I'm not wrong tho & I don't really care about punctuation when It's a online steam discussion . I'm positive ur's isn't much better mr war of rights clan boy. Quick to insult spelling or anything else that isn't game related because you are to stupid to hold a actual conversation . Would love to have a open debate about the game but my guess is you fall in the line of speech impediment or mental disorder, take ya pick.

Your inability to use proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation is kind of a detriment to your argument. People won't take you seriously if the points your trying to argue come off as immature and childish. If you can't put effort into spelling properly then you 100% don't put the effort into the game either.

Try being a bit more respectful when you come off with posts like this. I personally would have taken any opinion you had alot more seriously if it came from a place that showed you cared. Instead you just seem like you're not good at the game, and don't have the ability to criticise a game properly.

[Dark]

I can tell you how bad this game is, I was in the Marines, Iraq. so were a bunch of my Marine friends. We tried to play this game and stopped and refunded it because its so bad and unrealistic. Holding and aiming of a weapon is a joke and so is movement.

Devs, you all missed the mark by a mile!!

If Marines are not playing your game, you got problems!!!

[Magnus Aurelius, Bright Lord]

Originally posted by Dark:

If Marines are not playing your game, you got problems!!!

Why ? Do marines account for a very large portion of the gamer demographic ?

[Dark]

Originally posted by Magnus Aurelius, Bright Lord:

Originally posted by Dark:

If Marines are not playing your game, you got problems!!!

Why ? Do marines account for a very large portion of the gamer demographic ?

It shows that the games military aspect is bad, it doesn't matter that Military are not happy with the game it shows that the game in general is not good. Civilians don't know any better, So when someone from the military tells you that the games combat aspects are off or don't feel right, you should take their word for it.