So this is a mobile VR game..

[FreddieForever#1]

Since its coming to quest it will have low quality graphics? quest is really holding back VR.

[kebo]

If you take a look at Arizona Sunshine 1 and After the Fall then you will find out your answer. PC graphics are very liklely.

[🐵 Greg 🐵]

Graphic settings exist

[Gonzaxpain]

I don't think that will be the case with this game. Have you seen the new gameplay? it doesn't look like a Quest game.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GEcXdIaxfA

[TheGamerXxX]

Those were PS Graphics... dont be surprised it looks like a Mobile game

[Sammy M.F Bananas]

Dude quest isn't doing anything to hold back games? Honestly without the accessibility of the quest VR would be struggling. That thing injects studios with funds.

PS: Loads of quest users use airlink to their PC hardware.

[FreddieForever#1]

its based on the lowest hardware, its definitely a mobile vr game

[Xengre]

引用自 Gonzaxpain：

I don't think that will be the case with this game. Have you seen the new gameplay? it doesn't look like a Quest game.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GEcXdIaxfA

This looks exactly like a quest game. The models and textures are very very low quality with low quality lighting and shadows.

This is a massive step down from the visuals in the trailer from a few months ago which was designed to look like gameplay and less like in-game cinematic. I'd go so far as to say this might be one of the biggest visual downgrades ever seen in the industry's entire history. This looks legitimately, regarding graphics specifically, really bad. I mean, compare that to something like Dungeon Defenders from over 10 years ago and wow... looks quite comparable and that game had bad graphics for its time.

[kebo]

I hope you're trolling. The last trailer was CGI. And now you say they downgraded the graphics from a CGI trailer...

AS1 had good graphics. This one looks even better. I don't know where your expectations come from. If you don't like it, sell your VR headset.. There won't be many games that look better than this.

[FreddieForever#1]

引用自 kebo：

I hope you're trolling. The last trailer was CGI. And now you say they downgraded the graphics from a CGI trailer...

AS1 had good graphics. This one looks even better. I don't know where your expectations come from. If you don't like it, sell your VR headset.. There won't be many games that look better than this.

You dont get it, all im saying is that the game is BASED on mobile hardware and therefore wont look as good as it could have unlike HL ALYX for example.

[Xengre]

引用自 kebo：

I hope you're trolling. The last trailer was CGI. And now you say they downgraded the graphics from a CGI trailer...

AS1 had good graphics. This one looks even better. I don't know where your expectations come from. If you don't like it, sell your VR headset.. There won't be many games that look better than this.

I'm just going to pull my post from the other thread that was more detailed.

The newest trailer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpbl3n0D6WE

That looks extremely dated like a quest port. Compare it with Dead Island (the original game) from 2011 and they look quite similar, though Dead Island despite being 12 years old actually looks slightly better overall with texture details.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C30jBWi6tUA

The new Assassin's Creed Nexus VR for Quest looks far better than Arizona Sunshine 2.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQuCy8nfCq0

Now compare it to the reveal trailer's graphics which tries to look real even though it is clearly CG.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ab1wbeTKGNM

Then if you look at the game's specs on Steam it has:
Graphics: RTX 2070 / RX 5700 XT equivalent or greater

This is the minimum spec which is equivalent to what you can expect when playing it on PSVR2. There is no recommended spec (lol).

As you can see, I pointed out it was CG. I also pointed out it was designed to look like actual gameplay and was misleading in presentation. There are quite a few actions shown in the trailer that match actual interactions in the gameplay with regards to motion actions, shooting, etc. and much of its presentation tries to give off the feeling of gameplay despite obviously being more of a CG slice. However, with this approach it is already a bit too close of an attempt to mimic gameplay while also dramatically overhyping graphics. It actually makes zero sense why the reveal trailer's visuals are so good. It looks way better than new higher quality games like Dead Island 2. This along with other marketing efforts and the company's intentional dodging of quite a bit of information on the forums, socials, and reddit are clearly playing consumers.

This really isn't that far off from other games that have pulled similar stunts with downgrades from what turned out to be CG slices made to look like gameplay, or a mix of gameplay and cinematics, or instances like Witcher 3 and Watchdog's whole debacle.

It all rubs poorly due to these numerous combined factors on top of the actual game, literally, looking so much worse than other games and even losing to games from 12+ years ago.

[kebo]

The first trailer said NOT ACTUAL GAMEPLAY. Still you talk about "misleading", "overhyping graphics", "playing consumer" and "downgrades" .. Sorry, you got it wrong. Now stop crying. We all should be grateful for devs that actually go beyond Quest2 graphics these days dispite the PC playerbase beeing just a fraction.

[Xengre]

引用自 kebo：

The first trailer said NOT ACTUAL GAMEPLAY. Still you talk about "misleading", "overhyping graphics", "playing consumer" and "downgrades" .. Sorry, you got it wrong. Now stop crying. We all should be grateful for devs that actually go beyond Quest2 graphics these days dispite the PC playerbase beeing just a fraction.

Yikes. My condolences for your refusal to properly read due to your ego, and follow basic logic as you would realize you're post looks ridiculous and is not a valid response to my prior post. It appears you're just trolling at this point.

Btw, the dev did not go "beyond Quest 2 graphics". I literally showed you games proving this statement wrong with irrefutable video evidence. I also showed how the game looked, literally, worse than 12+ year old games. Clearly, you missed the initial point raised by the thread creator and not your ridiculous off-topic fringe rant.

I'll post some more from Quest 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kZtf5VGabA8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPKc0bxOuiE

Quest 2 visuals looking superior to Arizona Sunshine 2. I rest my case.

[kebo]

Here is a 6 minute gameplay video of the PC version:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW8ewqxy-lA

If you think the game will look like this on the Quest 2 (espescially lighting and shadows), you will wake up in a month and be dissapointed again.

[FreddieForever#1]

引用自 kebo：

Here is a 6 minute gameplay video of the PC version:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW8ewqxy-lA

If you think the game will look like this on the Quest 2 (espescially lighting and shadows), you will wake up in a month and be dissapointed again.

I dont care about shadows, im talking important stuff like polycount.

[Xengre]

引用自 kebo：

Here is a 6 minute gameplay video of the PC version:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW8ewqxy-lA

If you think the game will look like this on the Quest 2 (espescially lighting and shadows), you will wake up in a month and be dissapointed again.

Yup, I'm not going to discuss further with a troll. The "numerous" videos I posted above about the Quest 2 beating this game visually as well as 12 year old games debunk your point so the fact you went and then posted this video that looks worse than the one's I posted after is pretty silly.