Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Hammerwatch was simply perfect in couch co-op
All right. So not a game for us then. Thanks for your time
Sorry, no.
During NES/SNES days, fine. However everything plays better when players have the freedom of exploration on your own screen without being tethered or locked in other players menus.
Given the choice, I'm glad Hammerwatch games opt for online co-op.
Will be getting this along with some friends, the demo played great!
If you can do something as complex as the netcode, I can imagine that controlling 2 characters on the same screen should be doable... But I am not an expert.
Time, Resources, Cost - Plenty of reasons any dev - especially indie devs would avoid having to craft, implement, and test an entire set of functions.
Could they? Probably, sure. Would it impact everything else in the game? Definitely.
Since the Devs have done it in the past for similar games (seeing as the anniversary edition of hammer watch supports it), this decision appears to be more on the lazy/greedy part than being out of necessity.
An statement mentioning that they are testing how to implementing the feature would have been enough for fans of the franchise, but instead they want to test their fanbase to see if they are ok buying 2 copies of the game to play with a friend or 4 copies to make a full party.
The nature of this game is more open world with buildings, caves, delves, and various areas. Locking to a single screen would not be ideal and split screen? Mega oof. I can feel that in the few hours I played.
Again... they could, probably, sure. Would it impact everything else? Definitely.
As for buying two copies of the game, AFAIK this goes back to Game Boy needing multiple systems, the link cables, and yes, multiple copies of the game. I don't know if the campaign of 'people not buying your game' will gain much traction on something that genuinely interest them, but I do admire the thought.
Personally if the game looks fun I'm going to dive in and have the best fun I can with it. Crackshell has done killer things with Hammerwatch 1 and Heroes of Hammerwatch, so whatever they do? I'm in. Do I hope for other things with games? Of course, but this is the dev's vision. Super Mario Wonder coming out later this looks like it won't have online play... another Mario without online, again.
Unfortunately, them be the breaks.