sub 60 fps with shadows on, on a 4080 super and 5800x.

[John]

3440x1440p monitor I feel like my pc should be good enough to run a game that looks like this with medium settings.

[Black Mold Brain Rot]

im on 6800xt and 5800x and its the same but the worst thing is that there is no vsync fov or sensitivity settings

[PowerElite]

I had to activate vsync on Nvidia control panel and it improved things a bit. But playing w/ Shadows on is actually impossible.

[White Adjacent]

Just to compile what I've mentioned in other threads here -

5600X/4070 TI Super - 40-60 fps when looking towards the vendors. 180 when looking away with no fps limiter.

[640x480]

This game is lacking a lot of optimization, I pitty the guys in the other threads wanting to play on the steamdeck :/

[David, The Rock Hard]

Publicado originalmente por bungi:

This game is lacking a lot of optimization, I pitty the guys in the other threads wanting to play on the steamdeck :/

Yeah, it is basically unplayable. Best FPS I was able to get was 30, and only when in the hub area and looking away from everything. Honestly? I was expecting something like this, (only a little less severe) the second I saw the insane requirements they posted onto the steam store page.

But at least it is only really bad optimization on Heart Machine's part, so it could be fixed and made playable, possibly even on 60fps stable.

But it is pretty insane how literally nothing changes FPS. Prop detail between 1 to 10? Not even a single FPS improvement. Foliage distance between 0 to 10? Same thing, not even a single FPS. Even the shadows. Between 1 to 5 there is absolutely no change in fps what so ever, only once you go down from 1 to 0, which makes the game look absolutely unbearable to look at, only then you'll get some FPS gain.

[m33o44]

This game just released into early access.
I think this was to be expected

[Shibby]

What makes is worse is that the shadow options do change the quality from what I cant tell but the performance only increases when I turn off shadows completely. Thinking this is a refund from me since the performance is so bad and the gameplay feels like crap to me too. Sad day as I was hoping it would be better. Oh well.

[John]

Publicado originalmente por m33o44:

This game just released into early access.
I think this was to be expected

low fps is absolutely not expected on my pc with graphics like this.

[White Adjacent]

Publicado originalmente por m33o44:

This game just released into early access.
I think this was to be expected

Forever Winter was more stable and ran smoother than this on release and that game got raked over the coals for optimisation issues.

30 fps on a 5600X/4070 TI Super for a game charging 30 USD that has a whopping 5 graphic options 2 of which are fullscreen/resolution isn't "expected" or normal.

[armedpoop]

Publicado originalmente por m33o44:

This game just released into early access.
I think this was to be expected

Again, Risk of Rain 2 released into early access nearly 5 years ago without any issues like THIS. AND that game let your change keybinds and graphics settings at release!

[White Adjacent]

Publicado originalmente por armedpoop:

Publicado originalmente por m33o44:

This game just released into early access.
I think this was to be expected

Again, Risk of Rain 2 released into early access nearly 5 years ago without any issues like THIS. AND that game let your change keybinds and graphics settings at release!

People rolling over and eating slop happily is why MTX is as aggressive as it is. Horse armour dlc was "just cosmetic" and now look at us. People need start valuing their money more.

[m33o44]

Publicado originalmente por John:

Publicado originalmente por m33o44:

This game just released into early access.
I think this was to be expected

low fps is absolutely not expected on my pc with graphics like this.

I got the same GPU just a different CPU and I also think that I shouldn't expect any lag on my PC but in reality many games are unoptimized hellholes especially on their release days
The visuals you get don't really represent the workload of what your components have to handle.
For example (and for a benchmark):
Doom Eternal is one of the beautiest games I've played and it runs at +300 FPS on Ultra settings with RT on
God of War Ragnarök runs at +100 FPS
Indiana Jones on Ultra (no RT) does work with solid (capped) 60 FPS

Minecraft (without mods) runs at +120 FPS
Risk of Rain 2 sometimes falls off to 20 FPS (later in a run with mods) (vanilla I'm at 60-70 FPS)
GTA V doesn't run with past 40 FPS on my PC (I guess it's my fault)

[m33o44]

Publicado originalmente por armedpoop:

Publicado originalmente por m33o44:

This game just released into early access.
I think this was to be expected

Again, Risk of Rain 2 released into early access nearly 5 years ago without any issues like THIS. AND that game let your change keybinds and graphics settings at release!

I wouldn't call RoR2 a masterpiece of optimization but the release of RoR2 was way better than Hyper Light Drifter.
I'm just saying that I kinda expected this outcome. You know, keeping expectations low so I won't be disappointed so much for that one game I've been waiting for a long time?
Still I am disappointed with the result as I expected to play this game with M&K but now I'm playing a very unoptimized game with my controller with boring enemies and boring attack patterns.

[BiggieTheDog]

i7-13700k, 32gbs ddr4, 4070. I'm getting roughly 120 fps. A buddy of mine was rocking a 14700k, 32gbs ddr5, and a 4070 and is getting significantly worse performance (like sub 70fps).

It's all over the place.

[Tokyo Banana]

Seems to be really CPU dependant. I don't get any drops from 60fps but I have a 9800x3D/4070Ti Super. Crazy they didn't even include a Vsync option.