Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You know what you did and you got caught, plain and simple. We presented the evidence to you (as a courtesy) and your actions were irrefutable. Frankly your childish rebuttals to the evidence we presented of your wrong doing didn't help your case either. This is going to be the last time we address this with a reply. We at SAS do not take kindly to the type of infractions mentioned before.
One of the biggest issues with old games like Project Reality for BF2 and Il2 1946 is that the communities are maintained by stubborn older dudes who over administrate their already incredibly niche hobby.
I am utterly disgusted that I seem to have been judged by sad without any right of reply or ability to clarify what I have done wrong since I HAVE NO IDEA WHST YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
THIS IS NOT NATURAL OR ANY OTHER FIRM OF JUSTICE. I am incredibly disappointed that you do not even the common courtesy to lay out the evidence you claim to have which as I repeat I have never seen. In the United Kingdom we believe that everyone had a right to defend themselves by being presented with the evidence against them but I have not seen it. DO YOU HONESTLY THINK I WOULD BE ASKING IF I HAD A VLUE WHAT YIU ARE ON ABOUT?
If you think I had anytime to give to offending against the rules of the SAS forums you are entirely mistaken. I ask you again publish the correspondence you say you had with me because as far as I am concerned that is UNTRUE and you sir are not telling the truth!
WITHOUT LEGAL PREJUDICE: Further to my previous comments I would be grateful if you would supply an address for the service of legal documents including subpoenas as I am not, as a former member of the judiciary prepared to allow you to libel my good name without the production of evidence, and unless I hear from you with copies of that evidence you allegedly possess of my misconduct within 14 calendar days I shall instruct my legal advisor to open a case against you seeking punitive damages for the injury to my reputation.
Baseless legal threats from you has further solidified our resolve when it comes to our decision. Feel free to take whatever action you feel is needed to help you cope with the aftermath of your choices. All evidence was provided to you and your rebutle was considered by our panel of staff members. We also documented your erratic behavior (including these comments) in the aftermath of you being banned. Our private community has standards and the behavior you have displayed are NOT acceptable.
I shudder at the thought of an ex "magistrate" behaving in such a way. Please stop trying to contact our staff members. This issue is closed.
As I told you I have had no correspondence with sas forums since 2013 I repeat no correspondence you are being untruthful and refusing to produce the evidence you claim to have I think that tells everybody who is in the wrong. You say I'm harassing you but you refuse to give any evidence that supports your claim how pathetic your idea of justice is. Still as I suppose your President shows the same level of concern for justice and legal process we Brits now know what to ecpect.
This matter is not closed and just remember a legal threat is only a threat till it comes to pass so have a good 13 days (or produce the evidence) my lawyer is waiting. This isn't going away.
As I clearly told you before I believe my email/online identity has been hijacked by a malicious third party - your refusal to cooperate in me being able to get to the bottom of this and clear my name will be used in evidence.
All you had to do was provide copies of the correspondence you alleged you had with me identifying my misconduct. You have chosen to ignore that opportunity to deal with matters outside of a legal framework which I very much regret but that is your devision.
According to the reply from your ISP you are denying that I have ever had a registration with you so which is it? Either I committed some infractions which you refuse to identify or I don't exist?
You can't have it both ways - your story is beginning to unravel a bit better get it straightened out for court or you'll really be taken to the cleaners!
It's now 11 days for you to produce the evidence I really suggest that in your best interests you provide the information I politely asked for in every reply to you.
Ignoring my request will continue to damage your legal position and suggests that you are indeed maliciously defaming me.