Installer Steam
log på
|
sprog
简体中文 (forenklet kinesisk)
繁體中文 (traditionelt kinesisk)
日本語 (japansk)
한국어 (koreansk)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bulgarsk)
Čeština (tjekkisk)
Deutsch (tysk)
English (engelsk)
Español – España (spansk – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (spansk – Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (græsk)
Français (fransk)
Italiano (italiensk)
Bahasa indonesia (indonesisk)
Magyar (ungarsk)
Nederlands (hollandsk)
Norsk
Polski (polsk)
Português (portugisisk – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (portugisisk – Brasilien)
Română (rumænsk)
Русский (russisk)
Suomi (finsk)
Svenska (svensk)
Türkçe (tyrkisk)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisk)
Українська (ukrainsk)
Rapporter et oversættelsesproblem
I can't tell if you are serious, or just smoked to much when posted that. lol Its not a cheat dummy
Yup, Battlefield 2: Modern Combat. And the game was really good on the PlayStation 2.
Wrong! Uniform soldier aiming (or better known as Monitor distance horizontal) is preferential. It basically lets you translate the distance from the center of the screen where you want your aim to best match your sensitivity on your usual FOV.
For example I and many other people play best on 0% since I usually only need to do small corrections when aiming not insane flicks across the screen. At 178% your aim would be best if you had to flick to the edge of the screen which hardly ever happens. If you want to learn more come and discuss it on the mouse-sensitivity forum.
It is preferential true, as it's also down to aiming style, I just felt like the average person would benefit more from 178, especially when the default is 133%
I used 0% in BFV but in BF2042 it felt weird, however, that was when it first released and the slider was weird and went from 0-100, so I haven't actually tried it since, so I imagine it could be better now
Edit: Tried it again, I hate how the sights slow down when ADS'ing, I prefer having 1:1 sens from the hip and ads.